Literature DB >> 8938607

Adjacent-segment degeneration after lumbar fusion with instrumentation: a retrospective study.

M D Rahm1, B B Hall.   

Abstract

Adjacent-segment degeneration is a known consequence of spinal fusion. Factors associated with this, and its effect on results, have not been well identified. This study sought to determine factors associated with adjacent-segment degeneration and the effect this degeneration has on results after lumbar fusion and instrumentation. Forty-nine patients were retrospectively reviewed after lumbar fusion with instrumentation and analyzed for adjacent-segment degeneration. Adjacent-segment degeneration occurred in 17 (35%) patients and was associated with increasing patient age, the use of interbody fusion, and a worsening of clinical results with time. In older patients with stenosis, it was associated with previous surgery. This should be considered when choosing operative techniques in treating lumbar pathologic conditions, especially in older patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8938607

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord        ISSN: 0895-0385


  72 in total

1.  Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.

Authors:  René Schmidt; Hans-Joachim Wilke; Lutz Claes; Wolfhart Puhl; Marcus Richter
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-07-10       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Cervical and lumbar spinal arthroplasty: clinical review.

Authors:  T D Uschold; D Fusco; R Germain; L M Tumialan; S W Chang
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  Dynamic stabilization adjacent to single-level fusion: part I. Biomechanical effects on lumbar spinal motion.

Authors:  Patrick Strube; Stephan Tohtz; Eike Hoff; Christian Gross; Carsten Perka; Michael Putzier
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-08-04       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Analysis of biomechanical changes after removal of instrumentation in lumbar arthrodesis by finite element analysis.

Authors:  Ho-Joong Kim; Heoung-Jae Chun; Seong-Hwan Moon; Kyoung-Tak Kang; Hak-Sun Kim; Jin-Oh Park; Eun-Su Moon; Joon-Seok Sohn; Hwan-Mo Lee
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  [Long-term results of the Dynesys implant].

Authors:  C Klöckner
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  Answer to the Letter to the Editor of Yi Shen et al. concerning "Risk factors for adjacent segment pathology requiring additional surgery after single-level spinal fusion: impact of pre-existing spinal stenosis demonstrated by preoperative myelography" by I. Yugué et al. (2015) Eur Spine J Aug 14 doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4291-5.

Authors:  Itaru Yugue
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Charité total disc replacement--clinical and radiographical results after an average follow-up of 17 years.

Authors:  Michael Putzier; Julia F Funk; Sascha V Schneider; Christian Gross; Stephan W Tohtz; Cyrus Khodadadyan-Klostermann; Carsten Perka; Frank Kandziora
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-10-28       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of the effects of bilateral posterior dynamic and rigid fixation devices on the loads in the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.

Authors:  Antonius Rohlmann; Nagananda K Burra; Thomas Zander; Georg Bergmann
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-06       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Lumbar disc degeneration below a long arthrodesis (performed for scoliosis in adults) to L4 or L5.

Authors:  Ian J Harding; Sebastian Charosky; Raphael Vialle; Daniel H Chopin
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-11-08       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  [Current short- and long-term results of lumbar disc replacement : update 2008].

Authors:  B Wiedenhöfer; V Ewerbeck; A J Suda; C Carstens
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 0.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.