Literature DB >> 20643955

Deep phenotyping to predict live birth outcomes in in vitro fertilization.

Prajna Banerjee1, Bokyung Choi, Lora K Shahine, Sunny H Jun, Kathleen O'Leary, Ruth B Lathi, Lynn M Westphal, Wing H Wong, Mylene W M Yao.   

Abstract

Nearly 75% of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments do not result in live births and patients are largely guided by a generalized age-based prognostic stratification. We sought to provide personalized and validated prognosis by using available clinical and embryo data from prior, failed treatments to predict live birth probabilities in the subsequent treatment. We generated a boosted tree model, IVFBT, by training it with IVF outcomes data from 1,676 first cycles (C1s) from 2003-2006, followed by external validation with 634 cycles from 2007-2008, respectively. We tested whether this model could predict the probability of having a live birth in the subsequent treatment (C2). By using nondeterministic methods to identify prognostic factors and their relative nonredundant contribution, we generated a prediction model, IVF(BT), that was superior to the age-based control by providing over 1,000-fold improvement to fit new data (p<0.05), and increased discrimination by receiver-operative characteristic analysis (area-under-the-curve, 0.80 vs. 0.68 for C1, 0.68 vs. 0.58 for C2). IVFBT provided predictions that were more accurate for approximately 83% of C1 and approximately 60% of C2 cycles that were out of the range predicted by age. Over half of those patients were reclassified to have higher live birth probabilities. We showed that data from a prior cycle could be used effectively to provide personalized and validated live birth probabilities in a subsequent cycle. Our approach may be replicated and further validated in other IVF clinics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20643955      PMCID: PMC2922227          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1002296107

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  24 in total

Review 1.  Unexplained infertility.

Authors:  J F Randolph
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.190

2.  Sperm morphology, motility, and concentration in fertile and infertile men.

Authors:  D S Guzick; J W Overstreet; P Factor-Litvak; C K Brazil; S T Nakajima; C Coutifaris; S A Carson; P Cisneros; M P Steinkampf; J A Hill; D Xu; D L Vogel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-11-08       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Factors that affect outcome of in-vitro fertilisation treatment.

Authors:  A Templeton; J K Morris; W Parslow
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1996-11-23       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Prognostic models for the probability of achieving an ongoing pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and the importance of testing their predictive value.

Authors:  A M Stolwijk; G A Zielhuis; C J Hamilton; H Straatman; J M Hollanders; H J Goverde; P A van Dop; A L Verbeek
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 6.918

5.  Cumulative pregnancy rates for in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  D S Guzick; C Wilkes; H W Jones
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Embryo score to predict implantation after in-vitro fertilization: based on 957 single embryo transfers.

Authors:  C Giorgetti; P Terriou; P Auquier; E Hans; J L Spach; J Salzmann; R Roulier
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.918

7.  Number of good quality embryos on day 3 is predictive for both pregnancy and implantation rates in in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles.

Authors:  Aldo Volpes; Francesca Sammartano; Francesco Coffaro; Vito Mistretta; Piero Scaglione; Adolfo Allegra
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 8.  Benefits and challenges brought by improved results from in vitro fertilization.

Authors:  R P S Jansen
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.048

9.  A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception.

Authors:  M Bonduelle; U-B Wennerholm; A Loft; B C Tarlatzis; C Peters; S Henriet; C Mau; A Victorin-Cederquist; A Van Steirteghem; A Balaska; J R Emberson; A G Sutcliffe
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-12-02       Impact factor: 6.918

10.  Two new prediction rules for spontaneous pregnancy leading to live birth among subfertile couples, based on the synthesis of three previous models.

Authors:  C C Hunault; J D F Habbema; M J C Eijkemans; J A Collins; J L H Evers; E R te Velde
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2004-06-10       Impact factor: 6.918

View more
  12 in total

1.  Boosting predictions of treatment success.

Authors:  Michael LeBlanc; Charles Kooperberg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Defining a comprehensive verotype using electronic health records for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Mary Regina Boland; George Hripcsak; Yufeng Shen; Wendy K Chung; Chunhua Weng
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 3.  Are computational applications the "crystal ball" in the IVF laboratory? The evolution from mathematics to artificial intelligence.

Authors:  Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Evangelos Maziotis; Nikolaos Antoniou; Anna Rapani; George Anifandis; Panagiotis Bakas; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 3.412

4.  Derivation of human embryonic stem cells using a post-inner cell mass intermediate.

Authors:  Thomas O'Leary; Björn Heindryckx; Sylvie Lierman; Margot Van der Jeught; Galbha Duggal; Petra De Sutter; Susana M Chuva de Sousa Lopes
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2013-01-10       Impact factor: 13.491

5.  An artificial neural network for the prediction of assisted reproduction outcome.

Authors:  Paraskevi Vogiatzi; Abraham Pouliakis; Charalampos Siristatidis
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  External validation and calibration of IVFpredict: a national prospective cohort study of 130,960 in vitro fertilisation cycles.

Authors:  Andrew D A C Smith; Kate Tilling; Debbie A Lawlor; Scott M Nelson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Predictors of in vitro fertilization outcomes in women with highest follicle-stimulating hormone levels ≥ 12 IU/L: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Lina N Huang; Sunny H Jun; Nathalie Drubach; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Prognostic factors associated with clinical pregnancy in in vitro fertilization using pituitary down-regulation with depot and daily low-dose luteal phase gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists: A single center's experience.

Authors:  Caiyun Liao; Rui Huang; Roberta W Scherer; Xiao-Yan Liang
Journal:  J Hum Reprod Sci       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

9.  Uterine size and volume are associated with higher live birth rate in patients undergoing assisted reproduction technology: A prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Hong Gao; Dong-E Liu; Yumei Li; Jing Tang; Xinrui Wu; Hongzhuan Tan
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 10.  Promoting the use of elective single embryo transfer in clinical practice.

Authors:  Tamara Tobias; Fady I Sharara; Jason M Franasiak; Patrick W Heiser; Emily Pinckney-Clark
Journal:  Fertil Res Pract       Date:  2016-08-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.