Literature DB >> 8935904

Stop-reaction time and the internal clock.

L Rousseau1, R Rousseau.   

Abstract

In a stop-reaction-time (stop-RT) task, a subject is presented with a regular, isochronous sequence of brief signals separated by a constant time interval, or stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA). His/her task is to press a response key as fast as possible when the sequence stops. As the sequence unfolds, an internal representation of the SOA duration builds up. Stop-RT is assumed to be triggered when an internal clock, operating as an "alarm clock," reaches a time criterion. Criterion setting is contingent upon variability in the SOA's internal representation. In Experiment 1A, stop-RT was measured for isochronous sequences of brief tones, light flashes, and also sequences of tones and flashes presented in regular alternation (tone-light-tone ...). Stop-RT was a linear function of SOA duration (ranging from 250 to 1,000 msec), regardless of modality, supporting a "central-clock" hypothesis. On the other and, taken together, the results of Experiments 1A, 1B, 2, and 3 suggest that no internal representation of the bimodal (tone-light) SOA of alternating sequences builds up. Indeed, an alternating sequence is physically equivalent to two interlaced isochronous subsequences, one auditory and one visual. So, two internal representations, one for the auditory (tone-tone) and one for the visual (light-light) SOA, could build up, and two time criteria running "in parallel" could thus support stop-RT. To provide a critical test of parallel timing, stop-RT was measured for bimodal 5:3 polyrhythms formed by the superposition of auditory and visual isochronous sequences that had different SOA durations (Experiment 4). Parallel timing accounted for a large proportion of variance in polyrhythmic stop-RT data. Overall findings can be accounted for by assuming a functional architecture of an internal clock in which pulses emitted by a central pacemaker are available in parallel with two modality-specific switch-accumulator "timing modules."

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8935904     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  17 in total

1.  CAN A SENSORY SYSTEM BE SPECIFIED BY ITS INTERNAL NOISE?

Authors:  E EIJKMAN; A J VENDRIK
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1965-06       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  [Perception of duration as organization of successive stimuli; experimental demonstration].

Authors:  P FRAISSE
Journal:  Annee Psychol       Date:  1952

Review 3.  Optimal timing and the Weber function.

Authors:  P R Killeen; N A Weiss
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals.

Authors:  S Grondin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

5.  Perception and production of temporal intervals across a range of durations: evidence for a common timing mechanism.

Authors:  R B Ivry; R E Hazeltine
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  The subjective tempo difference between interaural and monaural sequences as a function of sequence length.

Authors:  G ten Hoopen; S Akerboom
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-11

7.  Duration discrimination of empty time intervals marked by intermodal pulses.

Authors:  R Rousseau; J Poirier; L Lemyre
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1983-12

8.  Discrimination of temporal jitter in patterned sequences of tones.

Authors:  R D Sorkin; G J Boggs; S L Brady
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Modality-specific effects on discrimination of short empty time intervals.

Authors:  S Hocherman; G Ben-Dov
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  1979-06

10.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963
View more
  8 in total

1.  Chronostasis without voluntary action.

Authors:  Iona Alexander; Kai V Thilo; Alan Cowey; Vincent Walsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-12-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Merging race models and adaptive networks: a parallel race network.

Authors:  Denis Cousineau
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2004-10

3.  Auditory and visual temporal sensitivity: evidence for a hierarchical structure of modality-specific and modality-independent levels of temporal information processing.

Authors:  Corinne C Stauffer; Judith Haldemann; Stefan J Troche; Thomas H Rammsayer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2011-04-03

4.  Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction.

Authors:  Allegra Indraccolo; Charles Spence; Argiro Vatakis; Vanessa Harrar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Crossmodal duration perception involves perceptual grouping, temporal ventriloquism, and variable internal clock rates.

Authors:  P Christiaan Klink; Jorrit S Montijn; Richard J A van Wezel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations.

Authors:  Kenichi Yuasa; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Capacity limit of simultaneous temporal processing: how many concurrent 'clocks' in vision?

Authors:  Xiaorong Cheng; Qi Yang; Yaqian Han; Xianfeng Ding; Zhao Fan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Two different mechanisms for the detection of stimulus omission.

Authors:  Shogo Ohmae; Masaki Tanaka
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-02-05       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.