Literature DB >> 21461936

Auditory and visual temporal sensitivity: evidence for a hierarchical structure of modality-specific and modality-independent levels of temporal information processing.

Corinne C Stauffer1, Judith Haldemann, Stefan J Troche, Thomas H Rammsayer.   

Abstract

The present study investigated modality-specific differences in processing of temporal information in the subsecond range. For this purpose, participants performed auditory and visual versions of a rhythm perception and three different duration discrimination tasks to allow for a direct, systematic comparison across both sensory modalities. Our findings clearly indicate higher temporal sensitivity in the auditory than in the visual domain irrespective of type of timing task. To further evaluate whether there is evidence for a common modality-independent timing mechanism or for multiple modality-specific mechanisms, we used structural equation modeling to test three different theoretical models. Neither a single modality-independent timing mechanism, nor two independent modality-specific timing mechanisms fitted the empirical data. Rather, the data are well described by a hierarchical model with modality-specific visual and auditory temporal processing at a first level and a modality-independent processing system at a second level of the hierarchy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21461936     DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0333-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Res        ISSN: 0340-0727


  36 in total

1.  Understanding the nature of the general factor of intelligence: the role of individual differences in neural plasticity as an explanatory mechanism.

Authors:  Dennis Garlick
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  Variable foreperiods and temporal discrimination.

Authors:  Simon Grondin; Thomas Rammsayer
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-05

3.  Temporal order judgement for auditory and visual stimuli.

Authors:  Magdalena Kanabus; Elzbieta Szelag; Ewa Rojek; Ernst Pöppel
Journal:  Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars)       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 1.579

4.  Effects of aging on absolute identification of duration.

Authors:  Teresa McCormack; Gordon D A Brown; Elizabeth A Maylor; Lucy B N Richardson; Richard J Darby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2002-09

5.  On estimating the difference limen in duration discrimination tasks: a comparison of the 2AFC and the reminder task.

Authors:  Einat Lapid; Rolf Ulrich; Thomas Rammsayer
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2008-02

6.  Rhythm perception in early infancy.

Authors:  L Demany; B McKenzie; E Vurpillot
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-04-21       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Duration discrimination of empty and filled intervals marked by auditory and visual signals.

Authors:  S Grondin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-09

8.  Developmental changes in time estimation: comparing childhood and old age.

Authors:  T McCormack; G D Brown; E A Maylor; R J Darby; D Green
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1999-07

9.  Temporal discrimination and the indifference interval. Implications for a model of the "internal clock".

Authors:  M Treisman
Journal:  Psychol Monogr       Date:  1963

10.  A cognitive-neuroscience approach for elucidation of mechanisms underlying temporal information processing.

Authors:  T H Rammsayer
Journal:  Int J Neurosci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.292

View more
  15 in total

1.  See what I hear? Beat perception in auditory and visual rhythms.

Authors:  Jessica A Grahn
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  How neuroscience can inform the study of individual differences in cognitive abilities.

Authors:  Dennis J McFarland
Journal:  Rev Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-24       Impact factor: 4.353

3.  Do not count too slowly: evidence for a temporal limitation in short-term memory.

Authors:  Simon Grondin; Vincent Laflamme; Giovanna Mioni
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-06

4.  A supramodal and conceptual representation of subsecond time revealed with perceptual learning of temporal interval discrimination.

Authors:  Ying-Zi Xiong; Shu-Chen Guan; Cong Yu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Interference between auditory and visual duration judgements suggests a common code for time.

Authors:  Pavlos C Filippopoulos; Pamela Hallworth; Sukye Lee; John H Wearden
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2012-11-22

6.  Why studying intermodal duration discrimination matters.

Authors:  Simon Grondin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-01

7.  Timescale- and Sensory Modality-Dependency of the Central Tendency of Time Perception.

Authors:  Yuki Murai; Yuko Yotsumoto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Stronger cortisol response to acute psychosocial stress is correlated with larger decrease in temporal sensitivity.

Authors:  Zhuxi Yao; Liang Zhang; Caihong Jiang; Kan Zhang; Jianhui Wu
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Visual-auditory differences in duration discrimination of intervals in the subsecond and second range.

Authors:  Thomas H Rammsayer; Natalie Borter; Stefan J Troche
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-26

10.  Audio-motor but not visuo-motor temporal recalibration speeds up sensory processing.

Authors:  Yoshimori Sugano; Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.