Literature DB >> 8934877

Differential response to UV stress and DNA damage during the yeast replicative life span.

S P Kale1, S M Jazwinski.   

Abstract

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is mortal. Before they die, individual yeasts bud repeatedly producing a finite number of progeny, which have the capacity for a full life span. A feature of aging in many species is the waning of resistance to stress. To determine whether this is the case in yeast, we have examined the survival (viability) of age-synchronized populations of yeasts of various ages, spanning youth, midlife, and old age, after irradiation with ultraviolet light (UV). Resistance to UV was biphasic. There was an increase through midlife, followed by a precipitous decline. For comparison, another mutagenic agent, ethyl methanesulfonate (EMS), was tested in the same way. The response was very different. A uniphase decrease in resistance to this DNA-alkylating agent was found with a plateau later in life. The results argue that the increase in resistance to UV with age is an active process and not simply a monotonic age change. RAS2 is among the genes that determine yeast longevity. This gene is preferentially expressed in young cells and has a life span-extending effect on yeasts. One known function of RAS2 is to mount a protective response to irradiation by UV, which occurs independently of DNA damage. The distinction between UV and EMS found here is consistent with the notion that resistance to UV plays a role in yeast longevity in a manner not related to DNA damage. Furthermore, it suggests that RAS2 may participate in this response. We have found that RAS2 expression and UV resistance coincide in middle-aged yeasts bolstering this possibility. These data and the eclipse in activity of several longevity determining genes at midlife in yeasts also raise the possibility that active life maintenance processes function through this period, after which the organism operates on any remaining reserves until death.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8934877     DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6408(1996)18:2<154::AID-DVG8>3.0.CO;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev Genet        ISSN: 0192-253X


  8 in total

1.  Biotechnological properties of distillery and laboratory yeasts in response to industrial stresses.

Authors:  Fernanda Bravim; Fernando L Palhano; A Alberto R Fernandes; Patricia M B Fernandes
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Synthetic circuit identifies subpopulations with sustained memory of DNA damage.

Authors:  Devin R Burrill; Pamela A Silver
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  The contribution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae replicative age to the variations in the levels of Trx2p, Pdr5p, Can1p and Idh isoforms.

Authors:  Aglaia V Azbarova; Kseniia V Galkina; Maxim I Sorokin; Fedor F Severin; Dmitry A Knorre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  The role of metabolism in aging.

Authors:  L S Luckinbill; P Foley
Journal:  J Am Aging Assoc       Date:  2000-04

Review 5.  Modeling aging and its impact on cellular function and organismal behavior.

Authors:  Emerson Santiago; David F Moreno; Murat Acar
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2021-09-26       Impact factor: 4.032

6.  Phenotypic heterogeneity is a selected trait in natural yeast populations subject to environmental stress.

Authors:  Sara L Holland; Tom Reader; Paul S Dyer; Simon V Avery
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 7.  Evidence for the hallmarks of human aging in replicatively aging yeast.

Authors:  Georges E Janssens; Liesbeth M Veenhoff
Journal:  Microb Cell       Date:  2016-06-20

8.  Bet hedging in yeast by heterogeneous, age-correlated expression of a stress protectant.

Authors:  Sasha F Levy; Naomi Ziv; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2012-05-08       Impact factor: 8.029

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.