Literature DB >> 6508024

Insertion of Hickman catheters. A comparison of cutdown and percutaneous techniques.

S J Davis, J S Thompson, J A Edney.   

Abstract

The insertion of Hickman catheters is useful in providing long-term vascular access in patients with a variety of conditions. Recently, enthusiasm has developed for the percutaneous insertion of the catheter because of the speed and ease of insertion. The insertion of 82 Hickman catheters in adults was reviewed. Thirty (94%) of 32 patients had a catheter placed successfully using a cutdown technique with success in 75 per cent of patients with the initial cutdown. Catheter placement was successful in 48 (96%) of the 50 patients with the percutaneous technique. The average operating time was 77 min for the cutdown technique compared with 33 min with percutaneous insertion. The overall complication rate was 18 per cent using the cutdown technique and 16 per cent for the percutaneous technique. The percutaneous technique for inserting Hickman catheters results in a much shorter operating time with minimal morbidity. As with any subclavian puncture, however, there is the risk of significant complications. The cutdown technique should be considered in patients with coagulopathy and when difficulty performing a percutaneous insertion is anticipated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6508024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  8 in total

1.  Clinical evaluation of percutaneous insertion and long-term usage of a new cuffed polyurethane catheter for central venous access.

Authors:  B J Moran; G L Sutton; S J Karran
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  Insertion of long term central venous catheters: time for a new look.

Authors:  A Adam
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-05

3.  Subcutaneous ports in the radiology suite: an effective and safe procedure for care in cancer patients.

Authors:  M A de Gregorio; J M Miguelena; J A Fernández; C de Gregorio; A Tres; E R Alfonso
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Standardized procedure prevents perioperative and early complications in totally implantable venous-access ports-a complication analysis of more than 1000 TIVAP implantations.

Authors:  Karolin Thiel; Sarah Kalmbach; Gerhard Maier; Dörte Wichmann; Martin Schenk; Alfred Königsrainer; Christian Thiel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2022-09-07       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Cephalic vein cutdown for totally implantable central venous port in children: a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

Authors:  Kyu-Hwan Jung; Suk-Bae Moon
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.089

6.  Protocol of an expertise based randomized trial comparing surgical Venae Sectio versus radiological puncture of Vena Subclavia for insertion of Totally Implantable Access Port in oncological patients.

Authors:  Philip Knebel; Lars Fischer; Eva Cremonese; Ruben Lopez-Benitez; Ulrike Stampfl; Boris Radeleff; Hans-Ulrich Kauczor; Markus W Büchler; Christoph M Seiler
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2008-10-24       Impact factor: 2.279

7.  Use of a hydrophilic coating wire reduces significantly the rate of central vein punctures and the incidence of pneumothorax in totally implantable access port (TIAP) surgery.

Authors:  Georgios Polychronidis; Roland Hennes; Cosima Engerer; Phillip Knebel; Daniel Schultze; Thomas Bruckner; Beat P Müller-Stich; Lars Fischer
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  1000 Port-A-Cath ® placements by subclavian vein approach: single surgeon experience.

Authors:  S Mudan; A Giakoustidis; D Morrison; S Iosifidou; R Raobaikady; K Neofytou; J Stebbing
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.352

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.