Literature DB >> 8933050

A RASH analysis of National Toxicology Program data: predictions for 30 compounds to be tested in rodent carcinogenesis experiments.

T D Jones1, C E Easterly.   

Abstract

Relative potencies for 30 compounds scheduled for carcinogenic testing in the 2-year rodent bioassays were estimated based on comparisons with a wide variety of bioassay data for benzo[a]pyrene, nicotine, cisplatin, aflatoxin B1, and cyclophosphamide. Potential for oncogenic transformation of each of the compounds was estimated from short-term bioassays. Promoting strength was assigned on the basis of comparisons of the product of relative potency and test dose with the distribution of similar products obtained for 67 common compounds in the data-base of Gold et al. A potency class for promotion was assigned on the basis of whether the potency-adjusted test dosage was > 2 sigma below the mean, > 1 sigma below the mean, within +/- sigma of the mean, > sigma above the mean, or > 2 sigma above the mean, as determined from the 67 compounds. The underlying hypothesis is that a weak test dose may have a low probability of revealing a potential carcinogen, whereas a strong dose may have a high probability of producing false-positive results. Predictions are therefore directed at the central 68% of the log-normal frequency distribution according to the assumption that +/- sigma represents the ideal test dose.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8933050      PMCID: PMC1469681          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.96104s51017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  13 in total

1.  Protection of human health from mixtures of radionuclides and chemical in drinking water.

Authors:  T D Jones; B A Owen; J R Trabalka
Journal:  Arch Environ Contam Toxicol       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  The third UKEMS collaborative trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 3.  Hazard evaluation for complex mixtures: relative comparisons to improve regulatory consistency.

Authors:  B A Owen; T D Jones
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 3.271

4.  Chemical scoring by a rapid screening of hazard (RASH) method.

Authors:  T D Jones; P J Walsh; A P Watson; B A Owen; L W Barnthouse; D A Sanders
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  A unifying concept for carcinogenic risk assessments.

Authors:  T D Jones; G D Griffin; P J Walsh
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1983-11-07       Impact factor: 2.691

6.  Use of bioassays in assessing health hazards from complex mixtures: a rash analysis.

Authors:  T D Jones
Journal:  Chemosphere       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 7.086

7.  Permissible concentrations of chemicals in air and water derived from RTECS entries: a "rash" chemical scoring system.

Authors:  T D Jones; P J Walsh; E A Zeighami
Journal:  Toxicol Ind Health       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 2.273

8.  A unifying concept for carcinogenic risk assessments: comparison with radiation-induced leukemia in mice and men.

Authors:  T D Jones
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 1.316

9.  Summary of carcinogenic potency and positivity for 492 rodent carcinogens in the carcinogenic potency database.

Authors:  L S Gold; T H Slone; L Bernstein
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 9.031

10.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  3 in total

1.  The NIEHS Predictive-Toxicology Evaluation Project.

Authors:  D W Bristol; J T Wachsman; A Greenwell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 2.  Use of QSARs in international decision-making frameworks to predict health effects of chemical substances.

Authors:  Mark T D Cronin; Joanna S Jaworska; John D Walker; Michael H I Comber; Christopher D Watts; Andrew P Worth
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Use of In Vivo and In Vitro Data to Derive a Chronic Reference Value for Crotonaldehyde Based on Relative Potency to Acrolein.

Authors:  Roberta L Grant; Allison F Jenkins
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 6.393

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.