Literature DB >> 8932618

Preliminary study of electrocautery smoke particles produced in vitro and during laparoscopic procedures.

J G DesCoteaux1, P Picard, E C Poulin, M Baril.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The objective of this preliminary study was to describe the particles contained in cautery smoke produced during five laparoscopic procedures and verify the collection method during three laboratory experiments on ex vivo animal tissue.
METHODS: A cascade impactor collected the smoke according to particle size, and particle weights were calculated on an electronic microbalance. Electron microscopic analysis and energy dispersive X-ray evaluation were used to determine particle morphology and elemental composition.
RESULTS: The particles, distributed according to size on the seven rotating trays of the impactor, had diameters ranging from 0.05 to >25 micro m, with most being 0.1-1 micro m. In vitro experiments yielded more particles, especially larger (>5 micro m) ones, than the surgical procedures, because the cauterized specimens could be placed much closer to the cascade impactor in the laboratory environment, eliminating most obstacles to particle recovery. In the laparoscopic surgery patients, larger particles, because of their physical properties, were more likely to remain trapped in the abdomen or to drop off in the collection apparatus. Uniformly, two populations of particles were demonstrated--either large, irregular fragments (2-25 micro m) rich in carbon and oxygen, suggesting structural cellular components, or small homogeneous spheres (0.1-0.5 micro m) composed of sodium, magnesium, calcium, and potassium salts.
CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the presence of breathable aerosols and cell-size fragments in the cautery smoke produced during laparoscopic procedures. Their exact chemical composition and potential adverse effects for patients and personnel are not known.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8932618     DOI: 10.1007/bf00188362

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  19 in total

1.  KINETICS OF PERITONEAL FLUID ABSORPTION IN ADULT MAN.

Authors:  L SHEAR; C SWARTZ; J A SHINABERGER; K G BARRY
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1965-01-21       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Role of fenestrated basement membrane in lymphatic absorption from peritoneal cavity.

Authors:  L ALLEN; T WEATHERFORD
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1959-09

3.  Blood-containing aerosols generated by surgical techniques: a possible infectious hazard.

Authors:  D L Jewett; P Heinsohn; C Bennett; A Rosen; C Neuilly
Journal:  Am Ind Hyg Assoc J       Date:  1992-04

4.  Control of ascites absorption in anesthetized cats: effects of intraperitoneal pressure, protein, and furosemide diuresis.

Authors:  J Zink; C V Greenway
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 22.682

5.  Absorption from the peritoneal cavity: SEM study of the mesothelium covering the peritoneal surface of the muscular portion of the diaphragm.

Authors:  E C Tsilibary; S L Wissig
Journal:  Am J Anat       Date:  1977-05

6.  The air-borne dissemination of viable tumor by high-energy neodymium laser.

Authors:  R C Hoye; A S Ketcham; G C Riggle
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  1967-01-15       Impact factor: 5.037

7.  The mutagenicity of electrocautery smoke.

Authors:  J E Gatti; C J Bryant; R B Noone; J B Murphy
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard?

Authors:  C Nezhat; W K Winer; F Nezhat; C Nezhat; D Forrest; W G Reeves
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  Smoke production and smoke reduction in endoscopic surgery: preliminary report.

Authors:  D Ott
Journal:  Endosc Surg Allied Technol       Date:  1993-08

10.  The viability of cells in the waste products of CO2-laser evaporation of Cloudman mouse melanomas.

Authors:  J W Oosterhuis; R C Verschueren; R Eibergen; J Oldhoff
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1982-01-01       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  14 in total

Review 1.  Surgical Efficacy Among Laparoscopic Ultrasonic Dissectors: Are We Advancing Safely? A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Rajesh Devassy; Sreelatha Gopalakrishnan; Rudy Leon De Wilde
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2015-09-14

2.  Surgical smoke management for minimally invasive (micro)endoscopy: an experimental study.

Authors:  Dietmar Mattes; Edah Silajdzic; Monika Mayer; Martin Horn; Daniel Scheidbach; Werner Wackernagel; Gerald Langmann; Andreas Wedrich
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Automatic smoke evacuation in laparoscopic surgery: a simplified method for objective evaluation.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Makoto Yamasaki; Masashi Hirota; Yasuaki Miyazaki; Jeong Ho Moon; Yoshihito Souma; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-02-23       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Mowbray; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A novel suction/coagulation integrated probe for achieving better hemostasis: development and clinical use.

Authors:  Hidekazu Takahashi; Naotsugu Haraguchi; Junichi Nishimura; Taishi Hata; Chu Matsuda; Hirofumi Yamamoto; Tsunekazu Mizushima; Masaki Mori; Yuichiro Doki; Kiyokazu Nakajima
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2018-02-17       Impact factor: 2.549

6.  Effect of nanostructured thin film on minimally invasive surgery devices applications: characterization, cell cytotoxicity evaluation and an animal study in rat.

Authors:  Keng-Liang Ou; Chao-Chia Weng; Erwan Sugiatno; Muhammad Ruslin; Yun-Ho Lin; Han-Yi Cheng
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-11-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of surgical plume among laparoscopic ultrasonic dissectors using a real-time digital quantitative technology.

Authors:  Fernando J Kim; David Sehrt; Alexandre Pompeo; Wilson R Molina
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Significance of surgical plume obstruction during laparoscopy.

Authors:  Rodrigo Donalisio da Silva; David Sehrt; Wilson R Molina; Jake Moss; Sang Hyun Park; Fernando J Kim
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.172

9.  Occupational exposures and determinants of ultrafine particle concentrations during laser hair removal procedures.

Authors:  Emily J Eshleman; Mallory LeBlanc; Lisa B Rokoff; Yinyin Xu; Rui Hu; Kachiu Lee; Gary S Chuang; Gary Adamkiewicz; Jaime E Hart
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 5.984

Review 10.  Is the ultrasonic scalpel recommended in head and neck surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic? State-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Miguel Mayo-Yánez; Christian Calvo-Henríquez; Jérôme R Lechien; Nicolas Fakhry; Tareck Ayad; Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 3.821

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.