Literature DB >> 3683071

Smoke from laser surgery: is there a health hazard?

C Nezhat1, W K Winer, F Nezhat, C Nezhat1, D Forrest, W G Reeves.   

Abstract

The composition of plume produced during carbon dioxide laser endoscopic treatment for endometriosis was examined to determine whether it represented a hazard to the surgical staff. A total of 32 plume samples were collected from 17 women undergoing laser laparoscopic treatment for endometriosis and/or adhesions. The smoke was found to consist of particles having a median aerodynamic diameter of 0.31 micron with a range of 0.10-0.80 micron. The size range has two consequences: 1) using a human red blood cell as a model for all cells, it can be stated with greater than 99.9999% certainty that no cell-size particles, including cancer cells, are present in the plume; 2) particles in this size range are too small to be effectively filtered by currently available surgical masks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3683071     DOI: 10.1002/lsm.1900070414

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Surg Med        ISSN: 0196-8092            Impact factor:   4.025


  12 in total

1.  Preliminary study of electrocautery smoke particles produced in vitro and during laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  J G DesCoteaux; P Picard; E C Poulin; M Baril
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Health risks associated with exposure to surgical smoke for surgeons and operation room personnel.

Authors:  Kae Okoshi; Katsutoshi Kobayashi; Koichi Kinoshita; Yasuko Tomizawa; Suguru Hasegawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2014-11-25       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Is surgical smoke harmful to theater staff? a systematic review.

Authors:  Nicholas Mowbray; James Ansell; Neil Warren; Pete Wall; Jared Torkington
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Infrared spectroscopy on smoke produced by cauterization of animal tissue.

Authors:  Michele Gianella; Markus W Sigrist
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.576

Review 5.  The risk of COVID-19 transmission by laparoscopic smoke may be lower than for laparotomy: a narrative review.

Authors:  Yoav Mintz; Alberto Arezzo; Luigi Boni; Ludovica Baldari; Elisa Cassinotti; Ronit Brodie; Selman Uranues; MinHua Zheng; Abe Fingerhut
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  A Systems Approach to Assess Transport and Diffusion of Hazardous Airborne Particles in a Large Surgical Suite: Potential Impacts on Viral Airborne Transmission.

Authors:  Marc Garbey; Guillaume Joerger; Shannon Furr
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Surgical smoke and ultrafine particles.

Authors:  Irene Brüske-Hohlfeld; Gerhard Preissler; Karl-Walter Jauch; Mike Pitz; Dennis Nowak; Annette Peters; H-Erich Wichmann
Journal:  J Occup Med Toxicol       Date:  2008-12-03       Impact factor: 2.646

8.  Commentary On: "Surgical Smoke - A Health Hazard in the Operating Theatre: A Study to Quantify Exposure and a Survey of the Use of Smoke Extractor Systems in UK Plastic Surgery Units".

Authors:  Nilay R Shah
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2012-08-25

9.  Comparison of Surgical Smoke Generated During Electrosurgery with Aerosolized Particulates from Ultrasonic and High-Speed Cutting.

Authors:  Vincent J Casey; Cian Martin; Peter Curtin; Kevin Buckley; Laoise M McNamara
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2020-08-07       Impact factor: 3.934

10.  Electrocautery, Diathermy, and Surgical Energy Devices: Are Surgical Teams at Risk During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Authors:  Kimberley Zakka; Simon Erridge; Swathikan Chidambaram; Michael Kynoch; James Kinross; Sanjay Purkayastha
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.