Literature DB >> 8932615

Clinical implication of preoperative oral cholecystogram for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

J G Kim1, Y J Suh, I S Moon, W B Park, C S Chun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to retrospectively assess the usefulness of the preoperative oral cholecystogram (OCG) as an index to the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and the operative pathologic findings. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the standard treatment for symptomatic gallbladder (GB) disease. However, no definite diagnostic modality that can predict the feasibility of LC and severity of pathologic anatomy has been proposed.
METHODS: Retrospective data were collected on 240 consecutive patients undergoing LC at St. Vincent Hospital, Catholic University Medical College, from October 1991 until December 1993. Radiologic interpretations of OCG were standardized according to the method of Koehler and Kyaw--from grade 0 to 4. And the operative findings--pericholecystic adhesion, color of GB, and thickness of the GB wall--were evaluated simultaneously.
RESULTS: The analysis showed that preoperative OCG can predict intraoperative GB perforation (p = 0.022), intraoperative controllable bleeding (p = 0.034), and operating time (p = 0.0001) according to the grade of visualization of GB. Grade 2- or -better visualized groups had more patients who had blue-colored GB (p = 0.000) and who had thin GB wall (p = 0.000).
CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative oral cholecystogram may be an accurate index of the feasibility of laparoscopic cholecystectomy--represented by operating time and important intraoperative minor complications related to the operative pathological findings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8932615     DOI: 10.1007/bf00188359

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  17 in total

1.  Randomised controlled trial of laparoscopic versus mini cholecystectomy. The McGill Gallstone Treatment Group.

Authors:  J S Barkun; A N Barkun; J S Sampalis; G Fried; B Taylor; M J Wexler; C A Goresky; J L Meakins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-11-07       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Routine versus selective intra-operative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  N J Soper; D L Dunnegan
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1992 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  ALTERED CONCEPTS OF THE MECHANISM OF NONVISUALIZATION OF THE GALLBLADDER.

Authors:  R N BERK; E C LASSER
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1964-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Establishment of a laparoscopic cholecystectomy training program.

Authors:  R W Bailey; A L Imbembo; K A Zucker
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 0.688

5.  Effect of fractionated administration of Telepaque on gallbladder visualization.

Authors:  P R Koehler; M M Kyaw
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Prospective study of abdominal ultrasonography before laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  C L Lee; C H Wu; T K Chen; Y C Lai; S S Yang; C S Huang; D F Chen
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 3.062

7.  Routine sonographic techniques fail to quantify gallstone size and number: a retrospective study of 111 surgically proved cases.

Authors:  J A Brink; J F Simeone; P R Mueller; S Saini; G A Tung; N O Spell; J T Ferrucci
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Oral cholecystography vs gallbladder sonography: a prospective, blinded reappraisal.

Authors:  D W Gelfand; N T Wolfman; D J Ott; N E Watson; Y M Chen; W J Dale
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Appraisal of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H A Graves; J F Ballinger; W J Anderson
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Identification of patients with cholesterol or pigment gallstones by discriminant analysis of radiographic features.

Authors:  S M Dolgin; J S Schwartz; H Y Kressel; R D Soloway; W T Miller; B W Trotman; A S Soloway; L I Good
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1981-04-02       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.