Literature DB >> 2669462

Routine sonographic techniques fail to quantify gallstone size and number: a retrospective study of 111 surgically proved cases.

J A Brink1, J F Simeone, P R Mueller, S Saini, G A Tung, N O Spell, J T Ferrucci.   

Abstract

We analyzed sonographic images retrospectively to determine their value in quantifying gallstone size and number in 111 surgically proved stone-containing gallbladders for which routine preoperative sonograms were available. The number and size of of stones found on pathologic examination were correlated with the results of image analysis. In patients with more than one stone, observable size differences were recorded if the smallest stone diameter was less than 50% of the largest stone diameter. Estimates of gallstone size and number from preoperative sonograms were correct in only 23 (21%) of 111 cases. Stone size and number were overestimated as often as they were underestimated. Stones of a uniform size were recognized correctly in 59 (92%) of 64 cases. Stones of two different sizes were correctly identified in only 14 (30%) of 47 cases; the second, smaller stones were missed in 26 (79%) of 33 cases. These findings indicate poor sonographic characterization of gallbladder contents when imaging studies are performed solely to determine the presence or absence of gallstones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2669462     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.153.3.503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  7 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of ursodiol: the creature from the black box.

Authors:  A K Diehl
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Role of oral cholecystography, real-time ultrasound, and CT in evaluation of gallstones and gallbladder function.

Authors:  L Marzio; P Innocenti; N Genovesi; F Di Felice; A M Napolitano; R Contantini; E Di Giandomenico
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1992

3.  Accuracy of ultrasound in counting and measuring gallstones.

Authors:  P M Bret; R Cordovez-Stanziola; M Atri; F F Illescas; A Aldis; S Herschorn
Journal:  Gastrointest Radiol       Date:  1991

4.  Clinical implication of preoperative oral cholecystogram for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J G Kim; Y J Suh; I S Moon; W B Park; C S Chun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Cirrhosis of the liver. A risk factor for development of cholelithiasis in males.

Authors:  F Fornari; G Civardi; E Buscarini; L Cavanna; D Imberti; S Rossi; G Sbolli; M Di Stasi; L Buscarini
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Results of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of gall bladder stones in 693 patients: a plea for restriction to solitary radiolucent stones.

Authors:  A Elewaut; A Crape; M Afschrift; W Pauwels; M De Vos; F Barbier
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Point-of-care ultrasound for evaluating intra-abdominal calcification in the pediatric emergency department: case series and review of literature.

Authors:  Vigil James; John Samuel; Chor Yek Kee; Gene Yong-Kwang Ong
Journal:  Ultrasound J       Date:  2020-12-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.