Literature DB >> 7207510

Identification of patients with cholesterol or pigment gallstones by discriminant analysis of radiographic features.

S M Dolgin, J S Schwartz, H Y Kressel, R D Soloway, W T Miller, B W Trotman, A S Soloway, L I Good.   

Abstract

In a search for a way to distinguish cholesterol gallstones from pigment gallstones by oral cholecystography, we evaluated 56 patients with surgically confirmed cholelithiasis. Only buoyancy was highly predictive of gallstone composition: all 14 patients with floating stones had cholesterol stones (P less than 0.01), but only one third of the patients with cholesterol stones had stone buoyancy. Using a function derived by stepwise discriminant analysis, we separated patients with cholesterol stones from those with pigment stones. The predictive accuracy was significantly improved: sensitivity was 95 per cent (37 of 39 patients with cholesterol stones), specificity was 82 per cent (14 of 17 patients with pigment stones), and efficiency was 91 per cent (51 of 56 total patients). The resultant function, applied prospectively to 17 additional cases, classified all of them correctly. In patients with cholelithiasis and gallbladders visualized on oral cholecystography, discriminant analysis can improve the prediction of gallstone composition and the subsequent selection of medial or surgical therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7207510     DOI: 10.1056/NEJM198104023041402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  16 in total

1.  Clinical implication of preoperative oral cholecystogram for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J G Kim; Y J Suh; I S Moon; W B Park; C S Chun
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Studying the gall bladder.

Authors:  S P Misra; M Dwivedi
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1989-05-20

3.  Prospective study of malabsorption induced risk of gall stone formation in relation to fall in plasma cholesterol.

Authors:  T I Sørensen; B Andersen; E Hylander; L I Jensen; K Laursen; H C Klein
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Differential diagnosis between amoebic liver abscess and acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  R A Boom; L Fonseca; C Yañez; D Gil; T Karson
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 5.  Ursodeoxycholic acid in the treatment of cholesterol cholelithiasis. Part II.

Authors:  W H Bachrach; A F Hofmann
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Imaging procedures to diagnose gall bladder disease.

Authors:  I A Bouchier
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-06-02

7.  Combination therapy with oral ursodeoxycholic and chenodeoxycholic acids: pretreatment computed tomography of the gall bladder improves gall stone dissolution efficacy.

Authors:  J R Walters; K A Hood; D Gleeson; J P Ellul; A Keightley; G M Murphy; R H Dowling
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Usefulness of gallbladder ejection fraction estimation to predict the recurrence of biliary pain in patients with symptomatic gallstones who did not undergo cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Sung Noh Hong; Jong Kyun Lee; Kyu Taek Lee; Jin Seok Heo; Seong Ho Choi; Poong Lyul Rhee; Seung Woon Paik; Byung Chul Yoo; Jong Chul Rhee
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.199

9.  Duodenal bile examination in identifying potential non-responders to bile salt treatment and its comparison with gall bladder bile examination.

Authors:  D K Agarwal; G Choudhuri; V A Saraswat; T S Negi; V K Kapoor; R Saxena
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Predicting the outcome of acute stroke: a prognostic score.

Authors:  C M Allen
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 10.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.