Literature DB >> 8932348

A comparison of axillary node status between cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence breast screening rounds.

P A Holland1, J Walls, C R Boggis, F Knox, A D Baildam, N J Bundred.   

Abstract

Screen-detected breast cancers are smaller than those detected in symptomatic populations and, for any given size, they are associated with fewer lymph node metastases. The management of axillary lymph nodes in patients with screen-detected breast cancer remains controversial. We have previously reported that prevalence (initial screen)-detected cancers are associated with nodal metastases in 17.4% of cases overall. Cancers < or = 10 mm, of any grade, are associated with metastases in only 5% of cases, and grade I cancers <30 mm are not associated with metastases. This led to our recommendation that axillary surgery is unnecessary for these groups of women. The present study compared the nodal status of cancers detected at the prevalence and first incidence (second) screens in order to determine whether our recommendation is appropriate for cancers detected at the first incidence screen. Overall, 30.1% of cancers detected in the first incidence screen presented axillary nodal metastases. At all size ranges, cancers detected at the first incidence screen were associated with significantly more lymph node metastases than prevalence-detected cancers. In particular, cancers < or = 10 mm were associated with metastases in 14.3% of cases. With the possible exception of grade I cancers, we believe that surgical staging of the axilla is essential for cancers detected at the first incidence screen, irrespective of size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8932348      PMCID: PMC2074862          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1996.602

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  17 in total

1.  The Nottingham Prognostic Index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Galea; R W Blamey; C E Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  The axilla: not a no-go zone.

Authors:  I S Fentiman; R E Mansel
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-01-26       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Ten year follow-up results of patients with carcinoma of the breast in a co-operative clinical trial evaluating surgical adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  B Fisher; N Slack; D Katrych; N Wolmark
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1975-04

4.  Basic issues in population screening for cancer.

Authors:  P Cole; A S Morrison
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer.

Authors:  L Tabàr; G Fagerberg; S W Duffy; N E Day; A Gad; O Gröntoft
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  Relation of number of positive axillary nodes to the prognosis of patients with primary breast cancer. An NSABP update.

Authors:  B Fisher; M Bauer; D L Wickerham; C K Redmond; E R Fisher; A B Cruz; R Foster; B Gardner; H Lerner; R Margolese
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1983-11-01       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Patterns of relapse and survival following radical mastectomy. Analysis of 716 consecutive patients.

Authors:  P Valagussa; G Bonadonna; U Veronesi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Is the three year breast screening interval too long? Occurrence of interval cancers in NHS breast screening programme's north western region.

Authors:  C B Woodman; A G Threlfall; C R Boggis; P Prior
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-01-28

9.  Comparative pathology of breast cancer in a randomised trial of screening.

Authors:  T J Anderson; J Lamb; P Donnan; F E Alexander; A Huggins; B B Muir; A E Kirkpatrick; U Chetty; W Hepburn; A Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Confirmation of a prognostic index in primary breast cancer.

Authors:  J H Todd; C Dowle; M R Williams; C W Elston; I O Ellis; C P Hinton; R W Blamey; J L Haybittle
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Preoperative selection of symptomatic breast cancer patients appropriate for lymphatic mapping and sentinel node biopsy.

Authors:  M Barry; R A Cahill; G Roche-Nagle; R Landers; D Walsh; D J Bouchier-Hayes; R G K Watson
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2007-05-03       Impact factor: 1.568

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.