Literature DB >> 1743178

The design of manual handling tasks: revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces.

S H Snook1, V M Ciriello.   

Abstract

Four new manual handling experiments are reviewed. The experiment used male and female subjects to study lifting, lowering, pushing, pulling, and carrying tasks. Each experiment used a psychophysical methodology with measurements of oxygen consumption, heart rate, and anthropometric characteristics. Independent variables included task frequency, distance, height and duration; object size and handles; extended horizontal reach; and combination tasks. The results of the four experiments were integrated with the results of seven similar experiments published previously by this laboratory. The integrated data were used to revise maximum acceptable weights and forces originally published in 1978. The revised tables are presented and compared with the original tables.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1743178     DOI: 10.1080/00140139108964855

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  41 in total

1.  Biomechanical comparison of isokinetic lifting and free lifting when applied to chronic low back pain rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Bouilland; P Loslever; F X Lepoutre
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Gender differences in psychophysically determined maximum acceptable weights and forces for industrial workers observed after twenty years.

Authors:  Vincent M Ciriello; Rammohan V Maikala; Patrick G Dempsey; Niall V O'Brien
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2010-10-16       Impact factor: 3.015

3.  Quantification of the safe maximal lift in functional capacity evaluations: comparison of muscle recruitment using SEMG and therapist observation.

Authors:  Carole James; Lynette Mackenzie; Mike Capra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2013-09

4.  The influence of task resistance on the characteristics of maximal one- and two-handed lifting exertions in men and women.

Authors:  D M Fothergill; D W Grieve; A D Pinder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1996

5.  A comparison of two lifting assessment approaches in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Remko Soer; Bas J J Poels; Jan H B Geertzen; Michiel F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-12

6.  Statistical prediction of load carriage mode and magnitude from inertial sensor derived gait kinematics.

Authors:  Sol Lim; Clive D'Souza
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.661

7.  The effect of handle friction and inward or outward torque on maximum axial push force.

Authors:  Na Jin Seo; Thomas J Armstrong; Don B Chaffin; James A Ashton-Miller
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.888

8.  Psychophysical basis for maximum pushing and pulling forces: A review and recommendations.

Authors:  Arun Garg; Thomas Waters; Jay Kapellusch; Waldemar Karwowski
Journal:  Int J Ind Ergon       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.656

Review 9.  Evaluation of the Impact of the Revised National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health Lifting Equation.

Authors:  Ming-Lun Lu; Vern Putz-Anderson; Arun Garg; Kermit G Davis
Journal:  Hum Factors       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.888

10.  Ergonomic Assessment of Floor-based and Overhead Lifts.

Authors:  Thomas R Waters; Robert Dick; Brian Lowe; Dwight Werren; Kelley Parsons
Journal:  Am J Safe Patient Handl Mov       Date:  2012-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.