Literature DB >> 8921600

Separating habit and recollection: memory slips, process dissociations, and probability matching.

J F Hay1, L L Jacoby.   

Abstract

Memory slips are errors in performance that result when an automatic basis for responding (e.g., habit) opposes the intention to perform a specific behavior. Prior research has focused on factors that influence the probability of a memory slip while neglecting factors that facilitate performance. Using L. L. Jacoby's (1991) process-dissociation procedure to examine performance in both a memory-slip and a facilitation condition, the authors separated the contribution of habit and recollection (intentional memory) in a cued-recall task. The authors found that manipulating the strength of habit affected its contribution to performance in a manner that produced probability matching, but recollection was unchanged. In contrast, manipulations of presentation rate and response time influenced recollection but did not affect habit. Such dissociations support a model of memory in which automatic and intentional influences make independent contributions to performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8921600     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.22.6.1323

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  16 in total

1.  Conscious and unconscious influences of memory for object location.

Authors:  J I Caldwell; M E Masson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach.

Authors:  M Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

3.  Perirhinal cortex removal dissociates two memory systems in matching-to-sample performance in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton; Elisabeth A Murray
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  The process-dissociation approach two decades later: convergence, boundary conditions, and new directions.

Authors:  Andrew P Yonelinas; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2012-07

5.  Automatic processing influences free recall: converging evidence from the process dissociation procedure and remember-know judgments.

Authors:  David P McCabe; Henry L Roediger; Jeffrey D Karpicke
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-04

6.  Experience with proactive interference diminishes its effects: mechanisms of change.

Authors:  Christopher N Wahlheim; Larry L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-02

7.  Competing cues: Older adults rely on knowledge in the face of fluency.

Authors:  Nadia M Brashier; Sharda Umanath; Roberto Cabeza; Elizabeth J Marsh
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2017-03-23

8.  Semantic priming, not repetition priming, is to blame for false hearing.

Authors:  Chad S Rogers
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-08

9.  Age effects on load-dependent brain activations in working memory for novel material.

Authors:  Roee Holtzer; Brian C Rakitin; Jason Steffener; Joe Flynn; Arjun Kumar; Yaakov Stern
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-21       Impact factor: 3.252

10.  One-trial memory and habit contribute independently to matching-to-sample performance in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta).

Authors:  Hsiao-Wei Tu; Robert R Hampton
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  2012-10-29       Impact factor: 2.231

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.