Literature DB >> 8917871

What do patients think about during their consultations? A qualitative study.

I Cromarty.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The consultation has been widely examined, but chiefly from the doctor's standpoint. Comparatively little is known about how patients view the event even though shared understanding is an accepted goal of each consultation. AIM: The aim of the study was to describe the range and types of thoughts which patients have during their consultations.
METHOD: In semistructured interviews, prompted by video playback and transcript, 18 patients gave detailed accounts of their thoughts and feelings during a recent consultation.
RESULTS: The study confirmed patients' central desire for understanding but also revealed a complex mix of other thoughts. Multiple problems and aims were usual. Patients routinely considered their relationship with the doctor, the doctor's willingness, ability and available time, and altered their behaviour accordingly.
CONCLUSION: Patients and doctors have different models of the consultation-better understanding of how patients consult should lead to better training for doctors and improve shared understanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917871      PMCID: PMC1239747     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  13 in total

1.  Exploration of doctor and patient agendas in general practice consultations.

Authors:  N M Butler; P D Campion; A D Cox
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 4.634

Review 2.  Studies of doctor-patient interaction.

Authors:  D L Roter; J A Hall
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 21.981

3.  In what way may videotapes be used to get significant information about the patient-physician relationship?

Authors:  E Arborelius; T Timpka
Journal:  Med Teach       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 3.650

4.  Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations.

Authors:  R Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-04-13

5.  The exceptional potential in each primary care consultation.

Authors:  N C Stott; R H Davis
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract       Date:  1979-04

Review 6.  Qualitative research methods in general practice and primary care.

Authors:  N Britten; R Jones; E Murphy; R Stacy
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.267

7.  Theoretical and methodological issues in sociological studies of consumer satisfaction with medical care.

Authors:  D Locker; D Dunt
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1978-07       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  General practitioners' comments on video recorded consultations as an aid to understanding the doctor-patient relationship.

Authors:  E Arborelius; T Timpka
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 2.267

9.  Frames and heuristics in doctor-patient discourse.

Authors:  D A Evans; M R Block; E R Steinberg; A M Penrose
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 4.634

10.  Pathways to the doctor-from person to patient.

Authors:  I K Zola
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 4.634

View more
  24 in total

1.  Expectations of health care: promoted, managed or shared?

Authors:  Julian Tudor Hart
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  The UMDS MSc in general practice: attainment of intended outcomes.

Authors:  G Calvert; N Britten
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  General practitioner psychological management of common emotional problems (II): A research agenda for the development of evidence-based practice.

Authors:  J Cape; C Barker; M Buszewicz; N Pistrang
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  [What lines of action should the Valencia Society of Family and Community Medicine adopt over the next 4 years?].

Authors:  J C Camposa; A Bonet; F Brotons; D Orozco; V Pedrera; J San Félix; J Joaquín Mira; A García; I Blaya
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2001-06-30       Impact factor: 1.137

5.  What determines competence within a general practice consultation? Assessment of consultation skills using simulated surgeries.

Authors:  J Allen; A Rashid
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  How useful is qualitative research?

Authors:  M Marshall
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  First do no harm: preparing for failure by practising failing safely.

Authors:  Wilfrid Treasure
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Patients' experiences of GP consultations for psychological problems: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Marta Buszewicz; Nancy Pistrang; Chris Barker; John Cape; Jonathan Martin
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Qualitative study of patients' perceptions of the quality of care for depression in general practice.

Authors:  Linda Gask; Anne Rogers; Dianne Oliver; Carl May; Martin Roland
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  Comparison of health care professionals' self-assessments of standards of care and patients' opinions on the care they received in hospital: observational study.

Authors:  P Durieux; A Bissery; S Dubois; I Gasquet; J Coste
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2004-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.