Literature DB >> 8917753

A comparison of word recognition and reading performance in foveal and peripheral vision.

K Latham1, D Whitaker.   

Abstract

Word recognition thresholds and rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP) reading rates for both unrelated words and meaningful sentences were examined across the visual field. Both word recognition thresholds and RSVP reading rates for unrelated words can be equated across the visual field by an increase in size scale. RSVP reading rates for meaningful sentences cannot be equated across the visual field, with the fovea demonstrating a qualitative superiority over the periphery, irrespective of scale. The results suggest that the early visual machinery which underlies word recognition is the same across the visual field apart from a change in scale, whilst the periphery is qualitatively inferior to the fovea at interpreting sentences with meaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917753     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(96)00022-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  30 in total

1.  The mechanism of word crowding.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Melanie M U Akau; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  Letter-recognition and reading speed in peripheral vision benefit from perceptual learning.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge; Sing-hang Cheung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Reading speed benefits from increased vertical word spacing in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Increasing interletter spacing facilitates encoding of words.

Authors:  Manuel Perea; Pablo Gomez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2012-04

5.  Shift in spatial scale in identifying crowded letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Bosco S Tjan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Impact of simulated micro-scotomas on reading performance in central and peripheral retina.

Authors:  Arun Kumar Krishnan; Hope M Queener; Scott B Stevenson; Julia S Benoit; Harold E Bedell
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 3.467

7.  Local motion processing limits fine direction discrimination in the periphery.

Authors:  Isabelle Mareschal; Peter J Bex; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Learning to identify crowded letters: does it improve reading speed?

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-10-24       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 9.  The knowledge base of the oculomotor system.

Authors:  M F Land; S Furneaux
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1997-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 10.  Enhancing visual performance for people with central vision loss.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.973

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.