Literature DB >> 8917230

Foregoing intensive care treatment in newborn infants with extremely poor prognoses. A study in four neonatal intensive care units in The Netherlands.

R de Leeuw1, A J de Beaufort, M J de Kleine, K van Harrewijn, L A Kollée.   

Abstract

Within the framework of the broader ethical discussion on end-of-life decision making in neonatology and the need to obtain more quantifiable data, we performed a multicenter study in four Dutch neonatal intensive care units. All infants who died in these units in 1993 were included in the study. Aside from cases in which foregoing treatment was not under discussion, cases in which death appeared inevitable (A cases) and cases in which foregoing treatment because of extremely poor prognosis was the decisive factor (B cases) were distinguished. A total of 181 neonatal deaths occurred. Thirty-five infants died even after full continuation of treatment. In 98 A cases and 48 B cases, which together represented 81% of all deaths, treatment was foregone either because the infants had no chance to survive or because of extremely poor prognoses. In these cases, the medical team ultimately achieved consensus of opinion, although in some instances several sessions were required. In three cases, the parents did not agree with the team advice. In one A case death appeared inevitable. In two B cases, the parents' wish to continue treatment was followed. In a large majority of B cases, the decisions to forego treatment were based on the presence of severe cerebral damage. In A cases there was no real choice because death appeared inevitable. However, in B cases neonatologists were obliged to determine whether continuation of treatment was justifiable or if withdrawal of treatment in view of extremely poor prognoses was preferred.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8917230     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3476(96)70146-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr        ISSN: 0022-3476            Impact factor:   4.406


  6 in total

1.  Parental visiting, communication, and participation in ethical decisions: a comparison of neonatal unit policies in Europe.

Authors:  M Cuttini; M Rebagliato; P Bortoli; G Hansen; R de Leeuw; S Lenoir; J Persson; M Reid; M Schroell; U de Vonderweid; M Kaminski; H Lenard; M Orzalesi; R Saracci
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Withholding/withdrawing treatment from neonates: legislation and official guidelines across Europe.

Authors:  H E McHaffie; M Cuttini; G Brölz-Voit; L Randag; R Mousty; A M Duguet; B Wennergren; P Benciolini
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.903

3.  Death in the neonatal intensive care unit: changing patterns of end of life care over two decades.

Authors:  D J Wilkinson; J J Fitzsimons; P A Dargaville; N T Campbell; P M Loughnan; P N McDougall; J F Mills
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Is it in the best interests of an intellectually disabled infant to die?

Authors:  D Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 5.  Infant mode of death in the neonatal intensive care unit: A systematic scoping review.

Authors:  Matthew Lin; Rachel Deming; Joanne Wolfe; Christy Cummings
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2022-01-20       Impact factor: 2.521

Review 6.  Neonatal end-of-life decisions and ethical perspectives.

Authors:  Madjid Soltani Gerdfaramarzi; Shabnam Bazmi
Journal:  J Med Ethics Hist Med       Date:  2020-12-05
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.