Literature DB >> 8916836

Effect of isoflurane on motor-evoked potentials induced by direct electrical stimulation of the exposed motor cortex with single, double, and triple stimuli in rats.

M Kawaguchi1, K Shimizu, H Furuya, T Sakamoto, H Ohnishi, J Karasawa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The clinical application of intraoperative motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) has been hampered by their sensitivity to anesthetics. Recently, to overcome anesthetic-induced depression of myogenic MEPs, multiple stimulus setups with a paired or a train of pulses for stimulation of the motor cortex were reported. However, the effects of anesthetics on MEPs induced by these stimulation techniques are unknown.
METHODS: Bipolar electrical stimulation of the left motor cortex was carried out in 15 rats anesthetized with thiopental while the compound muscle action potentials were recorded from the contralateral hind limb. After recording of the MEP in response to the single-shock stimulation of the motor cortex, paired pulses (double pulses) or a train of three pulses (triple pulses) with an interstimulus interval of each pulse at 0.3, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 ms were applied. After control MEP recording, isoflurane was administered at a concentration of 0.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration (MAC), 0.5 MAC, 0.75 MAC, and 1.0 MAC, and the effects of isoflurane on the MEPs induced by single, double, and triple pulses were evaluated.
RESULTS: In all animals, distinct baseline MEPs were recorded. During the administration of 0.25 MAC and 0.5 MAC isoflurane, MEPs induced by stimulation with a single pulse could be recorded in 87% and 33% of animals, respectively, and MEP amplitude was significantly reduced in a dose-dependent manner. During the administration of 0.75 MAC isoflurane, MEPs after single-pulse stimulation could not be recorded in any animals. By stimulating with paired or triple pulses, the success rate of MEP recording and MEP amplitude significantly increased compared with those after single pulse before and during the administration of isoflurane. Both the success rate of MEP recording and MEP amplitude after double- and triple-pulse stimulation decreased significantly in a dose-dependent manner during the administration of isoflurane.
CONCLUSIONS: Application of double or triple stimulation of the motor cortex increases the success rate of MEP recording and its amplitude during isoflurane anesthesia in rats. However, these responses are suppressed by isoflurane in a dose-dependent manner.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8916836     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199611000-00027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  8 in total

1.  Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation protocol applied to visual cortex of anaesthetized cat: effects on visually evoked single-unit activity.

Authors:  Vera Moliadze; Dimitrios Giannikopoulos; Ulf T Eysel; Klaus Funke
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2005-05-26       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Focused ultrasound neuromodulation of cortical and subcortical brain structures using 1.9 MHz.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Shutao Wang; Hong Chen; Qi Wang; Christian Aurup; Camilo Acosta; Antonio A O Carneiro; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.071

3.  Ultrasound neuromodulation: mechanisms and the potential of multimodal stimulation for neuronal function assessment.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Allegra Conti; Nicola Toschi; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-05-26

4.  Evaluation of the applicability of sevoflurane during post-tetanic myogenic motor evoked potential monitoring in patients undergoing spinal surgery.

Authors:  Hironobu Hayashi; Masahiko Kawaguchi; Ryuichi Abe; Yuri Yamamoto; Satoki Inoue; Munehisa Koizumi; Yoshinori Takakura; Hitoshi Furuya
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  Evidence for a role of the reticulospinal system in recovery of skilled reaching after cortical stroke: initial results from a model of ischemic cortical injury.

Authors:  Wendy J Herbert; Kimerly Powell; John A Buford
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-08-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Multiple ionic mechanisms mediate inhibition of rat motoneurones by inhalation anaesthetics.

Authors:  J E Sirois; J J Pancrazio; C Lynch; D A Bayliss
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

Review 7.  Focused Ultrasound Stimulation as a Neuromodulatory Tool for Parkinson's Disease: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Keng Siang Lee; Benjamin Clennell; Tom G J Steward; Andriana Gialeli; Oscar Cordero-Llana; Daniel J Whitcomb
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-02-19

8.  Impact of Anesthetics on Immune Functions in a Rat Model of Vagus Nerve Stimulation.

Authors:  Chloé A Picq; Didier Clarençon; Valérie E Sinniger; Bruno L Bonaz; Jean-François S Mayol
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-26       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.