Literature DB >> 27782686

Focused ultrasound neuromodulation of cortical and subcortical brain structures using 1.9 MHz.

Hermes A S Kamimura1, Shutao Wang2, Hong Chen2, Qi Wang2, Christian Aurup2, Camilo Acosta2, Antonio A O Carneiro3, Elisa E Konofagou4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Ultrasound neuromodulation is a promising noninvasive technique for controlling neural activity. Previous small animal studies suffered from low targeting specificity because of the low ultrasound frequencies (<690 kHz) used. In this study, the authors demonstrated the capability of focused ultrasound (FUS) neuromodulation in the megahertz-range to achieve superior targeting specificity in the murine brain as well as demonstrate modulation of both motor and sensory responses.
METHODS: FUS sonications were carried out at 1.9 MHz with 50% duty cycle, pulse repetition frequency of 1 kHz, and duration of 1 s. The robustness of the FUS neuromodulation was assessed first in sensorimotor cortex, where elicited motor activities were observed and recorded on videos and electromyography. Deeper brain regions were then targeted where pupillary dilation served as an indicative of successful modulation of subcortical brain structures.
RESULTS: Contralateral and ipsilateral movements of the hind limbs were repeatedly observed when the FUS was targeted at the sensorimotor cortex. Induced trunk and tail movements were also observed at different coordinates inside the sensorimotor cortex. At deeper targeted-structures, FUS induced eyeball movements (superior colliculus) and pupillary dilation (pretectal nucleus, locus coeruleus, and hippocampus). Histological analysis revealed no tissue damage associated with the FUS sonications.
CONCLUSIONS: The motor movements and pupillary dilation observed in this study demonstrate the capability of FUS to modulate cortical and subcortical brain structures without inducing any damage. The variety of responses observed here demonstrates the capability of FUS to perform functional brain mapping.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27782686      PMCID: PMC5045443          DOI: 10.1118/1.4963208

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  18 in total

1.  Ultrasonic neuromodulation by brain stimulation with transcranial ultrasound.

Authors:  Yusuf Tufail; Anna Yoshihiro; Sandipan Pati; Monica M Li; William J Tyler
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  Effect of isoflurane on motor-evoked potentials induced by direct electrical stimulation of the exposed motor cortex with single, double, and triple stimuli in rats.

Authors:  M Kawaguchi; K Shimizu; H Furuya; T Sakamoto; H Ohnishi; J Karasawa
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Localization of ultrasound-induced in vivo neurostimulation in the mouse model.

Authors:  Randy L King; Julian R Brown; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 2.998

4.  The organization of the forelimb representation of the C57BL/6 mouse motor cortex as defined by intracortical microstimulation and cytoarchitecture.

Authors:  Kelly A Tennant; Deanna L Adkins; Nicole A Donlan; Aaron L Asay; Nagheme Thomas; Jeffrey A Kleim; Theresa A Jones
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-08-25       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 5.  Ultrasonic neuromodulation.

Authors:  Omer Naor; Steve Krupa; Shy Shoham
Journal:  J Neural Eng       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 5.379

6.  Focused ultrasound modulates region-specific brain activity.

Authors:  Seung-Schik Yoo; Alexander Bystritsky; Jong-Hwan Lee; Yongzhi Zhang; Krisztina Fischer; Byoung-Kyong Min; Nathan J McDannold; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Ferenc A Jolesz
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 7.  Optical control of neuronal activity.

Authors:  Stephanie Szobota; Ehud Y Isacoff
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.981

8.  Pupil diameter tracks changes in control state predicted by the adaptive gain theory of locus coeruleus function.

Authors:  Mark S Gilzenrat; Sander Nieuwenhuis; Marieke Jepma; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

9.  Frequency Dependence of Ultrasound Neurostimulation in the Mouse Brain.

Authors:  Patrick Peiyong Ye; Julian R Brown; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Influence of the pressure field distribution in transcranial ultrasonic neurostimulation.

Authors:  Youliana Younan; Thomas Deffieux; Benoit Larrat; Mathias Fink; Mickael Tanter; Jean-Francois Aubry
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.071

View more
  33 in total

1.  Elimination of peripheral auditory pathway activation does not affect motor responses from ultrasound neuromodulation.

Authors:  Morteza Mohammadjavadi; Patrick Peiyong Ye; Anping Xia; Julian Brown; Gerald Popelka; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 8.955

2.  Systematic examination of low-intensity ultrasound parameters on human motor cortex excitability and behavior.

Authors:  Anton Fomenko; Kai-Hsiang Stanley Chen; Jean-François Nankoo; James Saravanamuttu; Yanqiu Wang; Mazen El-Baba; Xue Xia; Shakthi Sanjana Seerala; Kullervo Hynynen; Andres M Lozano; Robert Chen
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  In vitro single-unit recordings reveal increased peripheral nerve conduction velocity by focused pulsed ultrasound.

Authors:  S J Ilham; L Chen; T Guo; S Emadi; K Hoshino; B Feng
Journal:  Biomed Phys Eng Express       Date:  2018-05-03

4.  Ultrasound neuromodulation: mechanisms and the potential of multimodal stimulation for neuronal function assessment.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Allegra Conti; Nicola Toschi; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-05-26

5.  Ultrasonic Neuromodulation Causes Widespread Cortical Activation via an Indirect Auditory Mechanism.

Authors:  Tomokazu Sato; Mikhail G Shapiro; Doris Y Tsao
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Iterative Curve Fitting of the Bioheat Transfer Equation for Thermocouple-Based Temperature Estimation In Vitro and In Vivo.

Authors:  Hermes A S Kamimura; Christian Aurup; Ethan V Bendau; Niloufar Saharkhiz; Min Gon Kim; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 2.725

7.  Reversible neuroinhibition by focused ultrasound is mediated by a thermal mechanism.

Authors:  David P Darrow; Parker O'Brien; Thomas J Richner; Theoden I Netoff; Emad S Ebbini
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2019-07-23       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 8.  Neuromodulation with transcranial focused ultrasound.

Authors:  Jan Kubanek
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 4.047

9.  A Clinical System for Non-invasive Blood-Brain Barrier Opening Using a Neuronavigation-Guided Single-Element Focused Ultrasound Transducer.

Authors:  Antonios N Pouliopoulos; Shih-Ying Wu; Mark T Burgess; Maria Eleni Karakatsani; Hermes A S Kamimura; Elisa E Konofagou
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-25       Impact factor: 2.998

10.  Measurements of the Relationship Between CT Hounsfield Units and Acoustic Velocity and How It Changes With Photon Energy and Reconstruction Method.

Authors:  Taylor D Webb; Steven A Leung; Jarrett Rosenberg; Pejman Ghanouni; Jeremy J Dahl; Norbert J Pelc; Kim Butts Pauly
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 2.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.