Literature DB >> 8912401

A double-blind, fixed blood-level study comparing mirtazapine with imipramine in depressed in-patients.

J A Bruijn1, P Moleman, P G Mulder, W W van den Broek, A M van Hulst, R C van der Mast, B J van de Wetering.   

Abstract

Antidepressant effects of mirtazapine and imipramine were compared in a randomized, double blind, fixed blood-levels study with in-patients in a single centre. Patients with a DSM-III-R diagnosis of major depression and a Hamilton (17-item) score of > or = 18 were selected. After a drug-free and a placebo-washout period of 7 days in total, 107 patients still fulfilling the HRSD criterion of > or = 18, started on active treatment. The dose was adjusted to a predefined fixed blood level to avoid suboptimal dosing of imipramine. Concomitant psychotropic medication was administered only in a few cases because of intolerable anxiety or intolerable psychotic symptoms. Eight patients dropped out and two were excluded from analyses because of non-compliance; 97 completed the study. According to the main response criterion (50% or more reduction on the HRSD score) 11/51 (21.6%) patients responded on mirtazapine and 23/46 (50%) on imipramine after 4 weeks' treatment on the predefined blood level. Such a dramatic difference in efficacy between antidepressants has not often been reported before. The selection of (severely ill) in-patients, including those with suicidal or psychotic features, may have significance in this respect. Optimization of treatment with the reference drug imipramine through blood level control, exclusion of non-compliance for both drugs, exclusion of most concomitant medication and a low drop-out rate may also have contributed. It is concluded that imipramine is superior to mirtazapine in the patient population studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8912401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)        ISSN: 0033-3158            Impact factor:   4.530


  16 in total

1.  Mirtazapine vs. amitriptyline vs. placebo in the treatment of major depressive disorder.

Authors:  W T Smith; V Glaudin; J Panagides; E Gilvary
Journal:  Psychopharmacol Bull       Date:  1990

2.  The Atlantic gap: clinical trials in Europe and the United States.

Authors:  M Ansseau
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1992-01-15       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  Capillary gas chromatographic assay for the routine monitoring of the antidepressant mepirzepine in human plasma.

Authors:  J E Paanakker; H J van Hal
Journal:  J Chromatogr       Date:  1987-06-05

Review 4.  The relationship between antidepressant response and tricyclic antidepressant plasma concentrations. A retrospective analysis of the literature using logistic regression analysis.

Authors:  P J Perry; B M Pfohl; S G Holstad
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Monitoring of tricyclic antidepressant therapy.

Authors:  S Dawling
Journal:  Clin Biochem       Date:  1982-02       Impact factor: 3.281

6.  A double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of mirtazapine and doxepin in patients with major depression.

Authors:  M Marttila; J Jääskeläinen; R Järvi; M Romanov; E Miettinen; P Sorri; U Ahlfors; M Zivkov
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.600

7.  Paroxetine: a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor showing better tolerance, but weaker antidepressant effect than clomipramine in a controlled multicenter study. Danish University Antidepressant Group.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  1990-04       Impact factor: 4.839

Review 8.  Antidepressants. A comparative review of the clinical pharmacology and therapeutic use of the 'newer' versus the 'older' drugs.

Authors:  M V Rudorfer; W Z Potter
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  Research diagnostic criteria: rationale and reliability.

Authors:  R L Spitzer; J Endicott; E Robins
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1978-06

10.  Mirtazapine is more effective than trazodone: a double-blind controlled study in hospitalized patients with major depression.

Authors:  M van Moffaert; J de Wilde; A Vereecken; M Dierick; J L Evrard; J Wilmotte; J Mendlewicz
Journal:  Int Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 1.659

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression.

Authors:  Norio Watanabe; Ichiro M Omori; Atsuo Nakagawa; Andrea Cipriani; Corrado Barbui; Rachel Churchill; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2011-12-07

2.  A double-blind randomized study comparing imipramine with fluvoxamine in depressed inpatients.

Authors:  Walter W van den Broek; Tom K Birkenhäger; Paul G H Mulder; Jan A Bruijn; Peter Moleman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Imipramine and mirtazapine are less effective than expected.

Authors:  R M Pinder; M Zivkov
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.530

4.  Imipramine dose in relation to therapeutic plasma level: are clinical trials using imipramine as a positive control flawed?

Authors:  Tom K Birkenhäger; Walter W van den Broek; Peter Moleman; Arnold G Vulto; Jan A Bruijn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-12       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 5.  Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression.

Authors:  K J Holm; A Markham
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 6.  A risk-benefit assessment of mirtazapine in the treatment of depression.

Authors:  S Kasper; N Praschak-Rieder; J Tauscher; R Wolf
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Antidepressant drugs with differing pharmacological actions decrease activity of locus coeruleus neurons.

Authors:  Charles H K West; James C Ritchie; Katherine A Boss-Williams; Jay M Weiss
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2008-10-27       Impact factor: 5.176

8.  Mirtazapine improves sleep and lowers anxiety and depression in cancer patients: superiority over imipramine.

Authors:  Eylem Sahin Cankurtaran; Elvan Ozalp; Haldun Soygur; Derya Iren Akbiyik; Levent Turhan; Necati Alkis
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 9.  Mirtazapine: a review of its use in major depression and other psychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Katherine F Croom; Caroline M Perry; Greg L Plosker
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  Treatment with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and mirtapazine results in differential brain activation by visual erotic stimuli in patients with major depressive disorder.

Authors:  Won Kim; Bo-Ra Jin; Wan-Seok Yang; Kyuong-Uk Lee; Ra-Hyung Juh; Kook-Jin Ahn; Yong-An Chung; Jeong-Ho Chae
Journal:  Psychiatry Investig       Date:  2009-06-30       Impact factor: 2.505

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.