Literature DB >> 2140382

Paroxetine: a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor showing better tolerance, but weaker antidepressant effect than clomipramine in a controlled multicenter study. Danish University Antidepressant Group.

.   

Abstract

Antidepressant effects and unintended effects of paroxetine (30 mg/day) and clomipramine (150 mg/day) were compared in a double-blind, randomized, inpatient, fixed-dose, plasma-level-controlled study. Patients with a DSM-III diagnosis of major depressive disorder participated. After 1 week of single-blind placebo treatment 120 patients fulfilled the criterion of a Hamilton (17-item) score of greater than or equal to 18 and were started on active treatment for 6 weeks. Drop-outs on paroxetine (n = 12) were largely due to lack of effect, and on clomipramine (n = 19) due to lack of effect (n = 7), adverse reactions or severe side effects (n = 10) and development of mania (n = 2). According to the protocol, non-responders (Hamilton total greater than or equal to 16) after 4 weeks active treatment were terminated, and this occurred to 23 patients on paroxetine and four patients on clomipramine. Categorical response measures and group averages of rating scores showed a significantly better therapeutic effect of clomipramine from the second week of treatment on. These results are very similar to our earlier results with another selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (citalopram), but generally at variance with the literature on this class of antidepressants, which, however, mostly deals with outpatient studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2140382     DOI: 10.1016/0165-0327(90)90081-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Affect Disord        ISSN: 0165-0327            Impact factor:   4.839


  47 in total

Review 1.  Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors.

Authors:  C L DeVane
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 2.  Fortnightly review: drug treatment of depression.

Authors:  O Spigset; B Mårtensson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-05-01

Review 3.  Design of clinical trials of antidepressants: should a placebo control arm be included?

Authors:  J Fritze; H J Möller
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

4.  Pharmacological profile of the "triple" monoamine neurotransmitter uptake inhibitor, DOV 102,677.

Authors:  Piotr Popik; Martyna Krawczyk; Krystyna Golembiowska; Gabriel Nowak; Aaron Janowsky; Phil Skolnick; Arnold Lippa; Anthony S Basile
Journal:  Cell Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 5.046

Review 5.  Efficacy of fluvoxamine in severe depression.

Authors:  J Mendlewicz
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  A double-blind randomized study comparing imipramine with fluvoxamine in depressed inpatients.

Authors:  Walter W van den Broek; Tom K Birkenhäger; Paul G H Mulder; Jan A Bruijn; Peter Moleman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Gene-environment interaction in major depression and antidepressant treatment response.

Authors:  Robert Keers; Rudolf Uher
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Single-action versus dual-action antidepressants.

Authors:  Rakesh Jain
Journal:  Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2004

Review 9.  Severe depression: is there a best approach?

Authors:  S B Sonawalla; M Fava
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.749

10.  An evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of duloxetine: findings from 42 placebo-controlled studies.

Authors:  Joachim Wernicke; Alberto Lledó; Joel Raskin; Daniel K Kajdasz; Fujun Wang
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.