Literature DB >> 8911522

The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy: a contemporary and anatomic approach.

M J Harris1, I M Thompson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We applied the advances in anatomic techniques as developed for the radical retropubic prostatectomy to the perineal approach to radical prostatectomy. The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy maximizes cancer control and minimizes postoperative incontinence and impotence. This technique capitalizes on the many advantages associated with the perineal approach to the prostate.
METHODS: The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy addresses the posterior surface and posterior bladder neck regions prior to urethral division at the prostatic apex. Anatomic dissection of the striated urethral sphincter and preservation of the bladder neck, as well as a "watertight" anastomosis, are accomplished with excellent exposure. Cavernosal nerve preservation is possible in appropriately selected patients. Data are accumulated prospectively and reported herein.
RESULTS: Prostate-specific antigen detectability is seen in 2% and 4% of pT2 and pT2 to T3b cases, respectively at an average follow-up of 1 year. Immediate full continence is seen in 30% of cases; ultimately, 97.5% achieve full urinary control. Nerve-sparing techniques result in spontaneous erectile activity in 73%. Average length of hospital stay is less than 2 days, with most recent patients discharged on the day after surgery.
CONCLUSIONS: The anatomic radical perineal prostatectomy is a safe and effective method of treating men with clinically localized prostate cancer and should be part of every urologist's surgical armamentarium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8911522     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(96)00252-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  4 in total

1.  Radical perineal prostatectomy: a learning curve?

Authors:  Fadi Eliya; Ken Kernen; Jose Gonzalez; Ken Peters; Ibrahim Ibrahim; Kaylyn Petzel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  The normal post-surgical anatomy of the male pelvis following radical prostatectomy as assessed by magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Steven D Allen; Alan Thompson; S Aslam Sohaib
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Electrostimulation in therapy of postoperative urinary incontinence. Therapeutic value for quality of life].

Authors:  W Hoffmann; S Liedke; O Dombo; U Otto
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Contemporary radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Qiang Fu; Judd W Moul; Leon Sun
Journal:  Prostate Cancer       Date:  2011-04-14
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.