Literature DB >> 8902991

A multicenter randomized double-blind study of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in elderly in-patients bedridden for an acute medical illness. The Enoxaparin in Medicine Study Group.

J F Bergmann1, E Neuhart.   

Abstract

A multicenter, randomized double-blind study compared in two parallel groups the efficacy and safety of a low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) enoxaparin 20 mg once daily, with unfractionated heparin (UFH) 5000 IU twice daily, administered subcutaneously for 10 days, in the prevention of venous thrombosis disease in 442 hospitalized elderly patients bedridden for an acute medical illness. The main efficacy endpoint was defined as the occurrence of venous thrombosis, diagnosed by a daily fibrinogen uptake test, and/or documented clinical pulmonary embolism. Intention-to-treat analysis of efficacy showed that the incidence of venous thromboembolic events was low: 4.8% (10/207) in the LMWH group (9 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis and one of scintigraphic pulmonary embolism), and 4.6% (10/216) in the UFH group (10 episodes of isotopic venous thrombosis). The two treatments were equivalent, where equivalence was defined as a maximum difference of 7% between the two groups (p = 0.0005). There were no significant differences in terms of safety between the 216 patients in the LMWH group and the 223 patients in the UFH group who received at least one injection of the randomized treatment. During the study period, 15 patients (3.4%) died (7 in the LMWH group and 8 in the UFH group): 2 sudden deaths, one in each group including one case in which pulmonary embolism could not be excluded since no autopsy was performed, and 13 others deaths unrelated to the study treatments. Six patients (1.4%) presented a bleeding complication: 2 (0.9%) in the enoxaparin group (one major and one minor hemorrhage), and 4 (1.8%) in the UFH group (2 major and 2 minor hemorrhages). These results indicate that subcutaneous enoxaparin 20 mg once daily for 10 days is as effective and well tolerated as subcutaneous UFH 5000 IU twice daily in the prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in bedridden elderly in-patients presenting an acute medical illness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8902991

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 0340-6245            Impact factor:   5.249


  27 in total

Review 1.  Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis with unfractionated heparin in the hospitalized medical patient: the case for thrice daily over twice daily dosing.

Authors:  Charles E Mahan; Mario Pini; Alex C Spyropoulos
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Prevention of VTE in nonsurgical patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Susan R Kahn; Wendy Lim; Andrew S Dunn; Mary Cushman; Francesco Dentali; Elie A Akl; Deborah J Cook; Alex A Balekian; Russell C Klein; Hoang Le; Sam Schulman; M Hassan Murad
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  Risk-assessment algorithm and recommendations for venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in medical patients.

Authors:  Ana T Rocha; Edison F Paiva; Arnaldo Lichtenstein; Rodolfo Milani; Cyrillo Filho Cavalheiro; Francisco H Maffei
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2007

Review 4.  Formulary management of low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  W E Wade; B C Martin; J A Kotzan; W J Spruill; M A Chisoholm; M Perri
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 5.  Effect of thromboprophylaxis with anticoagulant drugs on the incidence of arterial thrombotic events in medical inpatients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Alessandro Squizzato; Federico Lussana; Walter Ageno; Marco Cattaneo
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 6.  Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with heart disease.

Authors:  B K Shively
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 7.  Management of venous thromboembolism in the elderly.

Authors:  Alex C Spyropoulos; Geno Merli
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Cost effectiveness of enoxaparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolic complications in acutely ill medical inpatients: modelling study from the hospital perspective in Germany.

Authors:  Peter K Schädlich; Michael Kentsch; Manfred Weber; Wolfgang Kämmerer; Josef Georg Brecht; Vijay Nadipelli; Eduard Huppertz
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: prophylaxis for hospitalized and nonhospitalized medical patients.

Authors:  Holger J Schünemann; Mary Cushman; Allison E Burnett; Susan R Kahn; Jan Beyer-Westendorf; Frederick A Spencer; Suely M Rezende; Neil A Zakai; Kenneth A Bauer; Francesco Dentali; Jill Lansing; Sara Balduzzi; Andrea Darzi; Gian Paolo Morgano; Ignacio Neumann; Robby Nieuwlaat; Juan J Yepes-Nuñez; Yuan Zhang; Wojtek Wiercioch
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

10.  Prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism in the elderly patient.

Authors:  Enrico Tincani; Mark A Crowther; Fabrizio Turrini; Domenico Prisco
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.458

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.