Literature DB >> 11139800

Deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis in patients with heart disease.

B K Shively1.   

Abstract

Therapy to prevent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism remains essential for inpatients, despite short periods of bedrest and hospitalization. Although most available data pertain to surgical patients, subgroups of medical patients are at moderate, high, and very high risk for DVT. These include patients admitted to the medical intensive care unit, those with the acute coronary syndromes, and those with congestive heart failure. Patients with unstable angina and acute myocardial infarction usually receive anticoagulation for other indications. However, for most patients with congestive heart failure (who will be at bedrest initially), DVT prophylaxis may be the only indication for anticoagulation. Recommended regimens are 5000 units of unfractionated heparin subcutaneously every 8 hours or enoxaparin 40 mg subcutaneously daily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11139800     DOI: 10.1007/s11886-001-0011-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3782            Impact factor:   2.931


  29 in total

1.  The use of dicumarol as an adjunct to the treatment of congestive heart failure; results in a controlled series of 61 cases.

Authors:  G M ANDERSON; E HULL
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1948-04       Impact factor: 0.954

2.  Dicumarol therapy in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  J H WISHART; C B CHAPMAN
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1948-11-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Dicumarol prophylaxis of thromboembolic disease in congestive heart failure.

Authors:  W P HARVEY; C A FINCH
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1950-02-09       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  G P Clagett; F A Anderson; W Geerts; J A Heit; M Knudson; J R Lieberman; G J Merli; H B Wheeler
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Economic impact of heart failure in the United States: time for a different approach.

Authors:  J B O'Connell; M R Bristow
Journal:  J Heart Lung Transplant       Date:  1994 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 10.247

6.  Reduction of mortality in general medical in-patients by low-dose heparin prophylaxis.

Authors:  H Halkin; J Goldberg; M Modan; B Modan
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1982-05       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Prevalence and prevention of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities in high-risk pulmonary patients.

Authors:  C Ibarra-Pérez; E Lau-Cortés; S Colmenero-Zubiate; N Arévila-Ceballos; J H Fong; R Sánchez-Martínez; M V Dominguez; J Elizalde-González
Journal:  Angiology       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 3.619

8.  Utilization of venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in the medical intensive care unit.

Authors:  M G Keane; E P Ingenito; S Z Goldhaber
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Prevalence of deep venous thrombosis among patients in medical intensive care.

Authors:  D R Hirsch; E P Ingenito; S Z Goldhaber
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-07-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin versus standard heparin and the prevention of thromboembolism in medical inpatients. The Heparin Study in Internal Medicine Group.

Authors:  J Harenberg; P Roebruck; D L Heene
Journal:  Haemostasis       Date:  1996 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.