Literature DB >> 8902282

Orthonasal and retronasal odorant identification based upon vapor phase input from common substances.

J Pierce1, B P Halpern.   

Abstract

Subjects were trained to identify by assigned number common substances presented as vapor phase stimuli via an orthonasal or a retronasal route. Following training, odorant identification learning was evaluated by measuring ability to correctly identify to a criterion. Those who met the criterion were then tested first with the stimuli presented to the nares that differed in location from the nares used in training, and second to the nares that corresponded in location to the nares used in training. It was found that, under conditions of natural retronasal breathing, orthonasally trained subjects made correct identifications on approximately 80% of the trials upon retronasal testing, but for the following orthonasal testing identifications were significantly more frequent, approaching 100% correct. After subsequent retronasal training, the same subjects' orthonasal identifications remained significantly higher, although identifications improved to approximately 92% correct on retronasal trials. Other subjects were instructed in a breathing technique designed to enhance retronasal stimulation. After orthonasal training, retronasal testing of these subjects still gave significantly fewer correct identifications than orthonasal testing, notwithstanding the modified retronasal breathing, but after subsequent retronasal training correct identifications by these subjects no longer differed significantly between orthonasal and retronasal testing. Efficacy of modified retronasal breathing was confirmed in two subsequent experiments. The observed substantial positive transfers between retronasal and orthonasal odorant identification training and testing loci demonstrate that these odorant pathways do not subserve completely independent olfactory systems, while the less accurate identifications via the retronasal route, unless instruction in retronasal breathing was given, suggest a difference in the efficiency with which odorants are normally delivered to the olfactory mucosa.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8902282     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/21.5.529

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  19 in total

1.  Retronasal testing of olfactory function: an investigation and comparison in seven countries.

Authors:  Ilona Croy; Heike Hoffmann; Carl Philpott; Philippe Rombaux; Antje Welge-Luessen; Jan Vodicka; Iordanis Konstantinidis; Eduardo Morera; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Olfactory imagery: a review.

Authors:  Richard J Stevenson; Trevor I Case
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2005-04

3.  Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium to retronasal air flow.

Authors:  John W Scott; Humberto P Acevedo; Lisa Sherrill; Maggie Phan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Transfer of Odor Perception From the Retronasal to the Orthonasal Pathway.

Authors:  Rui He; Talicia C Dukes; Leslie M Kay
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2021-01-01       Impact factor: 3.160

5.  Effects of Nasal Occlusion and Oral Contact on Perception of Metallic Taste from Metal Salts.

Authors:  Effie M Epke; Scott T McClure; Harry T Lawless
Journal:  Food Qual Prefer       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 5.565

6.  Retronasal odor representations in the dorsal olfactory bulb of rats.

Authors:  Shree Hari Gautam; Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Orosensory and Homeostatic Functions of the Insular Taste Cortex.

Authors:  Ivan E de Araujo; Paul Geha; Dana M Small
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 1.833

8.  Retronasal smell and detection thresholds of iron and copper salts.

Authors:  Effie M Epke; Harry T Lawless
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2007-04-24

Review 9.  Fleeting Beauty-The World of Plant Fragrances and Their Application.

Authors:  Angelika Kliszcz; Andrzej Danel; Joanna Puła; Beata Barabasz-Krasny; Katarzyna Możdżeń
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Direct behavioral evidence for retronasal olfaction in rats.

Authors:  Shree Hari Gautam; Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.