Literature DB >> 17215498

Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium to retronasal air flow.

John W Scott1, Humberto P Acevedo, Lisa Sherrill, Maggie Phan.   

Abstract

Responses of the rat olfactory epithelium were assessed with the electroolfactogram while odorants were presented to the external nares with an artificial sniff or to the internal nares by positive pressure. A series of seven odorants that varied from very polar, hydrophilic odorants to very nonpolar, hydrophobic odorants were used. Although the polar odorants activated the dorsal olfactory epithelium when presented by the external nares (orthonasal presentation), they were not effective when forced through the nasal cavity from the internal nares (retronasal presentation). However, the nonpolar odorants were effective in both stimulus modes. These results were independent of stimulus concentration or of humidity of the carrier air. Similar results were obtained with multiunit recordings from olfactory bulb. These results help to explain why human investigations often report differences in the sensation or ability to discriminate odorants presented orthonasally versus retronasally. The results also strongly support the importance of odorant sorption in normal olfactory processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17215498      PMCID: PMC2225990          DOI: 10.1152/jn.01305.2006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  Topographic representation of odorant molecular features in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Yuji K Takahashi; Masahide Kurosaki; Shuichi Hirono; Kensaku Mori
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  A new method for comparing orthonasal and retronasal olfaction.

Authors:  Stefan Heilmann; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 1.912

3.  Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation.

Authors:  Johannes Frasnelli; Stefan Heilmann; Thomas Hummel
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-05-13       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Mutual action of taste and olfaction.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain; L M Bartoshuk
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1977-05

5.  Chromatographic separation of odorants by the nose: retention times measured across in vivo olfactory mucosa.

Authors:  M M Mozell; M Jagodowicz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1973-09-28       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  "Taste-smell confusions" and the duality of the olfactory sense.

Authors:  P Rozin
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1982-04

7.  Taste and olfaction: independence vs interaction.

Authors:  C Murphy; W S Cain
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1980-03

8.  Effect of anatomy on human nasal air flow and odorant transport patterns: implications for olfaction.

Authors:  Kai Zhao; Peter W Scherer; Shoreh A Hajiloo; Pamela Dalton
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  The effects of mouth movements, swallowing, and spitting on retronasal odor perception.

Authors:  K J Burdach; R L Doty
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1987

10.  "Imposed" and "inherent" mucosal activity patterns. Their composite representation of olfactory stimuli.

Authors:  M M Mozell; P R Sheehe; D E Hornung; P F Kent; S L Youngentob; S J Murphy
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  13 in total

1.  Neural activity at the human olfactory epithelium reflects olfactory perception.

Authors:  Hadas Lapid; Sagit Shushan; Anton Plotkin; Hillary Voet; Yehudah Roth; Thomas Hummel; Elad Schneidman; Noam Sobel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Airflow and nanoparticle deposition in rat nose under various breathing and sniffing conditions: a computational evaluation of the unsteady effect.

Authors:  Jianbo Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Aerosol Sci       Date:  2010-11-01       Impact factor: 3.433

3.  Tuning to odor solubility and sorption pattern in olfactory epithelial responses.

Authors:  John W Scott; Lisa Sherrill; Jianbo Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Retronasal odor representations in the dorsal olfactory bulb of rats.

Authors:  Shree Hari Gautam; Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Effects of odor stimulation on antidromic spikes in olfactory sensory neurons.

Authors:  John W Scott; Lisa Sherrill
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A role for lung retention in the sense of retronasal smell.

Authors:  Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  Chemosens Percept       Date:  2015-05-10       Impact factor: 1.833

7.  Olfactory detectability of homologous n-alkylbenzenes as reflected by concentration-detection functions in humans.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; M H Abraham
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2009-03-20       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  Direct behavioral evidence for retronasal olfaction in rats.

Authors:  Shree Hari Gautam; Justus V Verhagen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A physiological increase of insulin in the olfactory bulb decreases detection of a learned aversive odor and abolishes food odor-induced sniffing behavior in rats.

Authors:  Pascaline Aimé; Chloé Hegoburu; Tristan Jaillard; Cyril Degletagne; Samuel Garcia; Belkacem Messaoudi; Marc Thevenet; Anne Lorsignol; Claude Duchamp; Anne-Marie Mouly; Andrée Karyn Julliard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Glomerular input patterns in the mouse olfactory bulb evoked by retronasal odor stimuli.

Authors:  Yuichi Furudono; Ginny Cruz; Graeme Lowe
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.288

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.