Literature DB >> 8899132

The oral dose-effect relationship for fluvoxamine: a fixed-dose comparison against placebo in depressed outpatients.

D D Walczak1, J T Apter, J A Halikas, R L Borison, J S Carman, G L Post, R Patrick, J B Cohn, L A Cunningham, B Rittberg, S H Preskorn, J S Kang, C S Wilcox.   

Abstract

This 7- to 8-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was performed to determine the dose-effect relationship and minimum effective dose for fluvoxamine maleate in a titrated fixed-dose study of major depressive disorder. Gradual titration over 2 weeks to fixed maintenance doses was employed to minimize dropout due to initial side effects. The study enrolled 600 outpatients, male and female, age 18-65, meeting DSM-III-R criteria for major depressive disorder. A 13-item subscore of the standard 21-Item Hamilton Depression Scale was used to minimize the possible contribution of known side effects from serotonin reuptake inhibitors to the overall HAM-D score. Secondary efficacy assessments included the HAM-D retardation factor, HAM-D depressed mood item, CGI-severity of illness item, and SCL depression factor. Fluvoxamine (50-150 mg/day) was therapeutically effective and well tolerated during 6 weeks of therapy. Based on the HAM-D depressed mood item, efficacy was dose dependent. The minimum effective dose was 50 mg/day. Fluvoxamine maleate shows dose-related effectiveness in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8899132     DOI: 10.3109/10401239609147751

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Clin Psychiatry        ISSN: 1040-1237            Impact factor:   1.567


  14 in total

1.  A double-blind randomized study comparing imipramine with fluvoxamine in depressed inpatients.

Authors:  Walter W van den Broek; Tom K Birkenhäger; Paul G H Mulder; Jan A Bruijn; Peter Moleman
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.530

2.  Sensitivity to changes during antidepressant treatment: a comparison of unidimensional subscales of the Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (IDS-C) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) in patients with mild major, minor or subsyndromal depression.

Authors:  Isabella Helmreich; Stefanie Wagner; Roland Mergl; Antje-Kathrin Allgaier; Martin Hautzinger; Verena Henkel; Ulrich Hegerl; André Tadić
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-09-30       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 3.  Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Dose-Response Relationship of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors in Major Depressive Disorder.

Authors:  Ewgeni Jakubovski; Anjali L Varigonda; Nicholas Freemantle; Matthew J Taylor; Michael H Bloch
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 4.  Problems in the Descriptions of the Psychiatric Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria in Publications of Antidepressant Efficacy Trials: A Qualitative Review and Recommendations for Improved Clarity.

Authors:  Mark Zimmerman; Matthew Multach; Emily Walsh; Lia K Rosenstein; Douglas Gazarian; Heather L Clark
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 5.749

5.  Does study design influence outcome?. The effects of placebo control and treatment duration in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  Psychother Psychosom       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 17.659

Review 6.  Differences in adverse effect reporting in placebo groups in SSRI and tricyclic antidepressant trials: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Anna von Lilienfeld-Toal; Imis Dogan; Franziska Schreiber; Stefan G Hofmann; Arthur J Barsky; Jerry Avorn
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Does differential drop-out explain the influence of study design on antidepressant response? A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 4.839

8.  Methodological aspects in the assessment of severity of depression by the Hamilton Depression Scale.

Authors:  H J Möller
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 9.  Early onset of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor antidepressant action: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Taylor; Nick Freemantle; John R Geddes; Zubin Bhagwagar
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  2006-11

10.  Less is more in antidepressant clinical trials: a meta-analysis of the effect of visit frequency on treatment response and dropout.

Authors:  Bret R Rutherford; Timothy M Cooper; Amanda Persaud; Patrick J Brown; Joel R Sneed; Steven P Roose
Journal:  J Clin Psychiatry       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.