CONTEXT: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often described as having a delayed onset of effect in the treatment of depression. However, some trials have reported clinical improvement as early as the first week of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To test the alternative hypotheses of delayed vs early onset of antidepressant action with SSRIs in patients with unipolar depression. DATA SOURCES: Trials identified by searching CENTRAL, The Cochrane Collaboration database of controlled trials (2005), and the reference lists of identified trials and other systematic reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of SSRIs vs placebo for the treatment of unipolar depression in adults that reported outcomes for at least 2 time points in the first 4 weeks of treatment (50 trials from >500 citations identified). Trials were excluded if limited to participants older than 65 years or specific comorbidities. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on trial design, participant characteristics, and outcomes by a single reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pooled estimates of treatment effect on depressive symptom rating scales were calculated for weeks 1 through 6 of treatment. In the primary analysis, the pattern of response seen was tested against alternative models of onset of response. The primary analysis incorporated data from 28 randomized controlled trials (n=5872). A model of early treatment response best fit the experimental data. Treatment with SSRIs rather than placebo was associated with clinical improvement by the end of the first week of use. A secondary analysis indicated an increased chance of achieving a 50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores by 1 week (relative risk, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.25) with SSRI treatment compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SSRIs is associated with symptomatic improvement in depression by the end of the first week of use, and the improvement continues at a decreasing rate for at least 6 weeks.
CONTEXT: Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are often described as having a delayed onset of effect in the treatment of depression. However, some trials have reported clinical improvement as early as the first week of treatment. OBJECTIVE: To test the alternative hypotheses of delayed vs early onset of antidepressant action with SSRIs in patients with unipolar depression. DATA SOURCES: Trials identified by searching CENTRAL, The Cochrane Collaboration database of controlled trials (2005), and the reference lists of identified trials and other systematic reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized controlled trials of SSRIs vs placebo for the treatment of unipolar depression in adults that reported outcomes for at least 2 time points in the first 4 weeks of treatment (50 trials from >500 citations identified). Trials were excluded if limited to participants older than 65 years or specific comorbidities. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted on trial design, participant characteristics, and outcomes by a single reviewer. DATA SYNTHESIS: Pooled estimates of treatment effect on depressive symptom rating scales were calculated for weeks 1 through 6 of treatment. In the primary analysis, the pattern of response seen was tested against alternative models of onset of response. The primary analysis incorporated data from 28 randomized controlled trials (n=5872). A model of early treatment response best fit the experimental data. Treatment with SSRIs rather than placebo was associated with clinical improvement by the end of the first week of use. A secondary analysis indicated an increased chance of achieving a 50% reduction in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores by 1 week (relative risk, 1.64; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.25) with SSRI treatment compared with placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with SSRIs is associated with symptomatic improvement in depression by the end of the first week of use, and the improvement continues at a decreasing rate for at least 6 weeks.
Authors: M M Katz; C Bowden; P Stokes; R Casper; A Frazer; S H Koslow; J Kocsis; S Secunda; A Swann; N Berman Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 1997-08 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: L F Fabre; F S Abuzzahab; M Amin; J L Claghorn; J Mendels; W M Petrie; S Dubé; J G Small Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 1995-11-01 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: David E Kemp; Stephen J Ganocy; Martin Brecher; Berit X Carlson; Suzanne Edwards; James M Eudicone; Gary Evoniuk; Wim Jansen; Andrew C Leon; Margaret Minkwitz; Andrei Pikalov; Hans H Stassen; Armin Szegedi; Mauricio Tohen; Arjen P P Van Willigenburg; Joseph R Calabrese Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Ewgeni Jakubovski; Anjali L Varigonda; Nicholas Freemantle; Matthew J Taylor; Michael H Bloch Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2015-11-10 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Belinda Graham; Natalia M Garcia; Mark S Burton; Andrew A Cooper; Peter P Roy-Byrne; Matig R Mavissakalian; Norah C Feeny; Lori A Zoellner Journal: Br J Psychiatry Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 9.319