Literature DB >> 15814952

Reappraisal of flow velocity ratio in common carotid artery to predict hemodynamic change in carotid stenosis.

Masahiro Kamouchi1, Kazuhiro Kishikawa, Yasushi Okada, Tooru Inoue, Setsuro Ibayashi, Mitsuo Iida.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Various Doppler criteria have been used to predict hemodynamically significant carotid stenosis. This study was performed to elucidate whether hemodynamically significant stenosis can be predicted indirectly by the blood flow velocity in the common carotid artery (CCA) measured with duplex ultrasonography in patients with unilateral stenosis of internal carotid artery (ICA).
METHODS: Eighty-five patients who were scheduled to undergo carotid endarterectomy for unilateral stenosis of ICA origin were analyzed. The flow velocities and their side-to-side ratios in the CCA were calculated. The flow velocities in the CCA were measured with conventional ultrasonography and poststenotic blood flow with transoral carotid ultrasonography. Cerebral angiography was performed to evaluate the intracranial collateral flow.
RESULTS: Among the absolute values and side-to-side ratios of Doppler flow velocities in the CCA, the end diastolic flow velocity (EDV) ratio in the CCA best correlated with the residual lumen area (r = 0.35; P = .0009), stenosis of diameter (r = 0.48; P < .0001), and poststenotic flow (r = 0.60; P < .0001). EDV ratios in the CCA were significantly lower in patients with collateral pathways (anterior communicating artery, P = .0005; posterior communicating artery, P = .004; ophthalmic artery, P < .0001; leptomeningeal collateral, P = .004). The optimal threshold value of the EDV ratio in the CCA for the presence of intracranial collateral flow and stenosis of diameter > or = 70% was 1.2. Those for tight stenosis in a cross-sectional area >95%, the reduction of poststenotic flow, and poststenotic narrowing were 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6, respectively.
CONCLUSION: The EDV ratio in the CCA appears to be an additional parameter for predicting hemodynamically significant stenosis in patients with unilateral ICA stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15814952      PMCID: PMC7977116     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  30 in total

1.  Duplex scanning exploration of the ophthalmic artery for the detection of the hemodynamically significant ICA stenosis.

Authors:  G Nuzzaci; D Righi; F Borgioli; I Nuzzaci; G Giannico; C Pratesi; R Pulli; E Chiti; F Gori
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Lack of correlation between pattern of collateralization and misery perfusion in patients with carotid occlusion.

Authors:  C P Derdeyn; A Shaibani; C J Moran; D T Cross; R L Grubb; W J Powers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Transcranial Doppler ultrasound criteria for hemodynamically significant internal carotid artery stenosis based on residual lumen diameter calculated from en bloc endarterectomy specimens.

Authors:  U Can; K L Furie; N Suwanwela; J F Southern; N R Macdonald; C S Ogilvy; F S Buonanno; W J Koroshetz; J P Kistler
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 7.914

4.  Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials.

Authors:  A F AbuRahma; P A Robinson; D L Strickler; S Alberts; L Young
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.466

5.  Transcranial Doppler ultrasound battery reliably identifies severe internal carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  J L Wilterdink; E Feldmann; K L Furie; M Bragoni; J G Benavides
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 7.914

6.  Flow-related anaerobic metabolic changes in patients with severe stenosis of the internal carotid artery.

Authors:  J van der Grond; B C Eikelboom; W P Mali
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 7.914

7.  Detection of carotid stenosis. From NASCET results to clinical practice.

Authors:  Y J Chang; A J Golby; G W Albers
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Poststenotic flow and intracranial hemodynamics in patients with carotid stenosis: transoral carotid ultrasonography study.

Authors:  Masahiro Kamouchi; Kazuhiro Kishikawa; Yasushi Okada; Tooru Inoue; Setsuro Ibayashi; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.825

9.  Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  J P Carpenter; F J Lexa; J T Davis
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.268

10.  Evaluation of distal extracranial internal carotid artery by transoral carotid ultrasonography in patients with severe carotid stenosis.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Kishikawa; Masahiro Kamouchi; Yasushi Okada; Tooru Inoue; Setsuro Ibayashi; Mitsuo Iida
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2002 Jun-Jul       Impact factor: 3.825

View more
  1 in total

1.  Construction of Multi-dimensional Arterial Health Status Map based on Molecular and Clinical Measurements, Fuzzy System and Data Cubes.

Authors:  Lawrence W C Chan; Iris F F Benzie; Thomas Y H Lau; Yongping Zheng; Alex K S Wong; Y Liu; Phoebe S T Chan
Journal:  Summit Transl Bioinform       Date:  2008-03-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.