Literature DB >> 8894050

DNA fingerprinting of captive breeding pairs of lesser white-fronted geese (Anser erythropus) with unknown pedigrees.

H Tegelström1, L von Essen.   

Abstract

For a number of decades, the lesser white-fronted goose (Anser erythropus) has been almost-absent from the Fennoscandian fauna and has a current population size of only about 60 breeding pairs, with fewer than 10 pairs in Sweden. During the period 1981-1991 more than 200 young have been reintroduced in northern Sweden. However, the origin and possible relatedness of lesser white-fronted individuals were unknown when the breeding program started. We have used DNA fingerprinting to assess the similarity of 18 individuals, i.e., the entire captive population used for breeding in 1991 and about 60% of the captive population used in 1981-1991. Minisatellite probe 33.15 provided an index for an average similarity of 0.39 between the mates of the 12 breeding pairs used for producing offspring for reintroduction. This is a higher similarity than in natural populations of birds in general but lower than in populations that have passed through serious population bottlenecks. Individuals originating from different breeders are more dissimilar than those from the same breeder. However, the close relationships (similarity, 0.5-0.6) found in a group of five individuals from different breeders show that selecting individuals from different breeding groups is not sufficient to prevent mating between closely related individuals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8894050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Genet        ISSN: 0006-2928            Impact factor:   1.890


  9 in total

1.  DNA fingerprints of captive wolves (Canis lupus).

Authors:  L Laikre; H Tegelström; H P Gelter
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.271

2.  DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success.

Authors:  T Burke
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Hypervariable 'minisatellite' regions in human DNA.

Authors:  A J Jeffreys; V Wilson; S L Thein
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1985 Mar 7-13       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Estimation of relatedness by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  M Lynch
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  A sequence in M13 phage detects hypervariable minisatellites in human and animal DNA.

Authors:  G Vassart; M Georges; R Monsieur; H Brocas; A S Lequarre; D Christophe
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-02-06       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Genetic similarity using DNA fingerprinting in cattle to determine relationship coefficient.

Authors:  H Mannen; S Tsuji; F Mukai; N Goto; S Ohtagaki
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1993 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.645

7.  Estimates of relatedness and inbreeding in goose strains from DNA fingerprints.

Authors:  A A Grunder; M P Sabour; J S Gavora
Journal:  Anim Genet       Date:  1994-06       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Analytical DNA fingerprinting in lions: parentage, genetic diversity, and kinship.

Authors:  D A Gilbert; C Packer; A E Pusey; J C Stephens; S J O'Brien
Journal:  J Hered       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.645

9.  Demographic study of a wild house sparrow population by DNA fingerprinting.

Authors:  J H Wetton; R E Carter; D T Parkin; D Walters
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 May 14-20       Impact factor: 49.962

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Population genomics reveals lack of greater white-fronted introgression into the Swedish lesser white-fronted goose.

Authors:  David Díez-Del-Molino; Johanna von Seth; Niclas Gyllenstrand; Fredrik Widemo; Niklas Liljebäck; Mikael Svensson; Per Sjögren-Gulve; Love Dalén
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.