Literature DB >> 21227336

DNA fingerprinting and other methods for the study of mating success.

T Burke1.   

Abstract

Methods that allow the detection and verification of genetic relationships among organisms studied in the field have long been sought by workers in evolutionary biology. Since its inception just four years ago, DNA fingerprinting has already begun to fulfil its promise as a widely applicable solution to this problem. Here, recent progress with fingerprinting is discussed in the context of some other DNA techniques. In particular, the use of molecular methods is revolutionizing the study of mating systems.
Copyright © 1989. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Year:  1989        PMID: 21227336     DOI: 10.1016/0169-5347(89)90213-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol        ISSN: 0169-5347            Impact factor:   17.712


  7 in total

1.  DNA fingerprinting in schistosome-vector snails.

Authors:  P Jarne; B Delay; C Bellec; G Roizes; G Cuny
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 1.890

2.  Multiple mating and clutch size in invertebrate brooders versus pregnant vertebrates.

Authors:  John C Avise; Andrey Tatarenkov; Jin-Xian Liu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Heritability estimates and maternal effects on tarsus length in pied flycatchers, Ficedula hypoleuca.

Authors:  Jaime Potti; Santiago Merino
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  DNA fingerprinting of captive breeding pairs of lesser white-fronted geese (Anser erythropus) with unknown pedigrees.

Authors:  H Tegelström; L von Essen
Journal:  Biochem Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.890

5.  Phosphorus source driving the soil microbial interactions and improving sugarcane development.

Authors:  Thiago Gumiere; Alain N Rousseau; Diogo Paes da Costa; Alice Cassetari; Simone Raposo Cotta; Fernando Dini Andreote; Silvio J Gumiere; Paulo Sergio Pavinato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Sexual selection does not influence minisatellite mutation rate.

Authors:  William Amos
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 3.260

7.  Can patterns of chromosome inversions in Drosophila pseudoobscura predict polyandry across a geographical cline?

Authors:  Paul Herrera; Michelle L Taylor; Alison Skeats; Tom A R Price; Nina Wedell
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 2.912

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.