Literature DB >> 8888394

Lessons from mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle breast biopsy.

W A Berg1, R H Hruban, D Kumar, H R Singh, R F Brem, O M Gatewood.   

Abstract

A thorough understanding of the limitations of sampling and histopathologic issues affecting lesion management is critical to successful large-core (14-gauge) needle breast biopsy. The most common problems are differentiating usual hyperplasia, atypical hyperplasia, and carcinoma in situ; satisfactory sampling of microcalcifications, often present in adjacent benign and malignant processes; differentiating phyllodes tumor from cellular fibroadenoma; and assessing the extent of an in situ component in mixed invasive and in situ carcinoma. Equally important is understanding what constitutes an acceptable histopathologic result given the mammographic appearance of the lesion. Mammographers and pathologists need experience in identifying benign processes that can manifest as discrete masses at mammography and core biopsy: focal fibrosis, apocrine metaplasia, sclerosing adenosis, and fat necrosis. When present as discrete histopathologic processes at core biopsy, such diagnoses should be accepted. Nonspecific diagnoses such as "benign breast tissue" should be avoided by pathologists when a discrete process is evident; absence of a discrete finding to explain the mammographic appearance should prompt repeat core or excisional biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8888394     DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.16.5.8888394

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  8 in total

1.  Non-operative diagnosis--effect on repeat-operation rates in the UK breast screening programme.

Authors:  M G Wallis; S Cheung; O Kearins; G M Lawrence
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-28       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Comparison of mammographically guided breast biopsy techniques.

Authors:  V Velanovich; F R Lewis; S D Nathanson; V F Strand; G B Talpos; S Bhandarkar; R Elkus; W Szymanski; J J Ferrara
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; Fernando U Kay; Ivan Pedrosa; Lauren Kolski; Yair Lotan; Claus G Roehrborn; Brad Hornberger; Yin Xi; Franto Francis; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 4.  Guidelines from the European Society of Breast Imaging for diagnostic interventional breast procedures.

Authors:  Matthew Wallis; Anne Tardivon; Anne Tarvidon; Thomas Helbich; Ingrid Schreer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 7.034

5.  Developing a comprehensive database management system for organization and evaluation of mammography datasets.

Authors:  Yirong Wu; Daniel L Rubin; Ryan W Woods; Mai Elezaby; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2014-10-16

6.  Image guided versus palpation guided core needle biopsy of palpable breast masses: a prospective study.

Authors:  Smriti Hari; Swati Kumari; Anurag Srivastava; Sanjay Thulkar; Sandeep Mathur; Prasad Thotton Veedu
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  Integrating pathology and radiology disciplines: an emerging opportunity?

Authors:  James Sorace; Denise R Aberle; Dena Elimam; Silvana Lawvere; Ossama Tawfik; W Dean Wallace
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 8.775

8.  Trends in breast biopsies for abnormalities detected at screening mammography: a population-based study in the Netherlands.

Authors:  V van Breest Smallenburg; J Nederend; A C Voogd; J W W Coebergh; M van Beek; F H Jansen; W J Louwman; L E M Duijm
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-05-21       Impact factor: 7.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.