Literature DB >> 27939349

An initial negative round of targeted biopsies in men with highly suspicious multiparametric magnetic resonance findings does not exclude clinically significant prostate cancer-Preliminary experience.

Daniel N Costa1, Fernando U Kay2, Ivan Pedrosa3, Lauren Kolski2, Yair Lotan4, Claus G Roehrborn4, Brad Hornberger4, Yin Xi2, Franto Francis5, Neil M Rofsky3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Targeted prostate biopsies are changing the landscape of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis with the degree of suspicion on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) being a strong predictor of targeted biopsy outcome. Data regarding the rate and potential causes of false-negative magnetic resonance imaging-transrectal ultrasound (MRI-TRUS) fusion-targeted biopsy in patients with highly suspicious mpMRI findings are lacking.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the rate of clinically significant PCa detection in repeat targeted biopsy or surgery in patients with highly suspicious mpMRI findings and in an initial negative MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-center, retrospective study of prospectively generated data, men with highly suspicious lesions (Likert 5 score) on mpMRI and an initial negative MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy were reviewed. The rate of PCa detection in a subsequent MRI-TRUS fusion-targeted biopsy or radical prostatectomy was determined. Tumors in the intermediate- and high-risk groups according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network criteria were considered clinically significant.
RESULTS: A total of 32 men with 38 Likert 5 lesions were identified. Repeat targeted biopsy or surgery detected cancer in 42% (16/38) of the Likert 5 lesions with initial negative targeted biopsy. Most of these cancers were intermediate- (69%; 11/16) or high-risk (25%; 4/16) tumors.
CONCLUSION: A negative round of targeted biopsies does not exclude clinically significant PCa in men with highly suspicious mpMRI findings. Patients with imaging-pathology disagreement should be carefully reviewed and considered for repeat biopsy or for strict surveillance.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biopsy; Diagnosis; Early detection; Magnetic resonance imaging; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27939349      PMCID: PMC5366083          DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.11.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Oncol        ISSN: 1078-1439            Impact factor:   3.498


  22 in total

1.  Prospective Evaluation of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2 for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Francesca V Mertan; Matthew D Greer; Joanna H Shih; Arvin K George; Michael Kongnyuy; Akhil Muthigi; Maria J Merino; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 2.  MR Imaging-Transrectal US Fusion for Targeted Prostate Biopsies: Implications for Diagnosis and Clinical Management.

Authors:  Daniel N Costa; Ivan Pedrosa; Francisco Donato; Claus G Roehrborn; Neil M Rofsky
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.333

3.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

Authors:  M Minhaj Siddiqui; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Baris Turkbey; Arvin K George; Jason Rothwax; Nabeel Shakir; Chinonyerem Okoro; Dima Raskolnikov; Howard L Parnes; W Marston Linehan; Maria J Merino; Richard M Simon; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  The rate of imaging-histologic discordance of benign breast disease: a multidisciplinary approach to the management of discordance at a large university-based hospital.

Authors:  Jennifer E Mihalik; Lisa Krupka; Roxanne Davenport; Lee Tucker; Christine Toevs; R Stephen Smith
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Prostate cancer, version 2.2014.

Authors:  James L Mohler; Philip W Kantoff; Andrew J Armstrong; Robert R Bahnson; Michael Cohen; Anthony Victor D'Amico; James A Eastham; Charles A Enke; Thomas A Farrington; Celestia S Higano; Eric Mark Horwitz; Christopher J Kane; Mark H Kawachi; Michael Kuettel; Timothy M Kuzel; Richard J Lee; Arnold W Malcolm; David Miller; Elizabeth R Plimack; Julio M Pow-Sang; David Raben; Sylvia Richey; Mack Roach; Eric Rohren; Stan Rosenfeld; Edward Schaeffer; Eric J Small; Guru Sonpavde; Sandy Srinivas; Cy Stein; Seth A Strope; Jonathan Tward; Dorothy A Shead; Maria Ho
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 11.908

6.  Characterization of prostate lesions as benign or malignant at multiparametric MR imaging: comparison of three scoring systems in patients treated with radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Tiphaine Vaché; Flavie Bratan; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Sylvain Roche; Muriel Rabilloud; Olivier Rouvière
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging guided diagnostic biopsy detects significant prostate cancer and could reduce unnecessary biopsies and over detection: a prospective study.

Authors:  James E Thompson; Daniel Moses; Ron Shnier; Phillip Brenner; Warick Delprado; Lee Ponsky; Marley Pulbrook; Maret Böhm; Anne-Maree Haynes; Andrew Hayen; Phillip D Stricker
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-02-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate Cancer Diagnosis on Repeat Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy of Benign Lesions: Recommendations for Repeat Sampling.

Authors:  Raju Chelluri; Amichai Kilchevsky; Arvin K George; Abhinav Sidana; Thomas P Frye; Daniel Su; Michele Fascelli; Richard Ho; Steven F Abboud; Baris Turkbey; Maria J Merino; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Integrating pathology and radiology disciplines: an emerging opportunity?

Authors:  James Sorace; Denise R Aberle; Dena Elimam; Silvana Lawvere; Ossama Tawfik; W Dean Wallace
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2012-09-05       Impact factor: 8.775

10.  Five-point Likert scaling on MRI predicts clinically significant prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  Taisuke Harada; Takashige Abe; Fumi Kato; Ryuji Matsumoto; Hiromi Fujita; Sachiyo Murai; Naoto Miyajima; Kunihiko Tsuchiya; Satoru Maruyama; Kohsuke Kudo; Nobuo Shinohara
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 2.264

View more
  4 in total

1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging - Transrectal ultrasound-guided cognitive fusion biopsy of the prostate: Clinically significant cancer detection rates stratified by the Prostate Imaging and Data Reporting System version 2 assessment category.

Authors:  Susan John; Steven Cooper; Rodney H Breau; Trevor A Flood; Ilias Cagiannos; Luke T Lavallee; Christopher Morash; Joseph O'sullivan; Nicola Schieda
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06-19       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 2.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: the next step forward!

Authors:  Emanuel Darius Cata; Iulia Andras; Teodora Telecan; Attila Tamas-Szora; Radu-Tudor Coman; Dan-Vasile Stanca; Ioan Coman; Nicolae Crisan
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2021-04-29

Review 3.  Diagnostic Performance of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-directed Targeted plus Regional Biopsy Approach in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marinus J Hagens; Mar Fernandez Salamanca; Anwar R Padhani; Pim J van Leeuwen; Henk G van der Poel; Ivo G Schoots
Journal:  Eur Urol Open Sci       Date:  2022-05-02

4.  Yield of Repeat Targeted Direct in-Bore Magnetic Resonance-Guided Prostate Biopsy (MRGB) of the Same Lesions in Men Having a Prior Negative Targeted MRGB.

Authors:  Wulphert Venderink; Sjoerd Fm Jenniskens; J P Michiel Sedelaar; Tsutomu Tamada; Jurgen J Fütterer
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.500

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.