Literature DB >> 8887291

Effects of different membranes and dialysis technologies on patient treatment tolerance and nutritional parameters. The Italian Cooperative Dialysis Study Group.

F Locatelli1, F Mastrangelo, B Redaelli, C Ronco, D Marcelli, G La Greca, G Orlandini.   

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that the biochemical and cellular phenomena induced by blood/ membrane/dialysate interactions contribute to dialysis-related intradialytic and long-term complications. However, there is a lack of large, prospective, randomized trials comparing biocompatible and bioincompatible membranes, and convective and diffusive treatment modalities. The primary aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to evaluate whether the use of polysulfone membrane with bicarbonate dialysate offers any advantage (in terms of treatment tolerance, nutritional parameters and pre-treatment beta-microglobulin levels) over a traditional membrane (Cuprophan). A secondary aim was to assess whether the use of more sophisticated methods consisting of a biocompatible synthetic membrane with different hydraulic permeability at different ultrafiltration rate (high-flux hemodialysis and hemodiafiltration) offers any further advantages. Seventy-one Centers were involved and stratified according to the availability of only the first two or all four of the following techniques: Cuprophan hemodialysis (Cu-HD), low-flux polysulfone hemodialysis (LfPS-HD), high-flux polysulfone high-flux hemodialysis (HfPS-HD), and high-flux polysulfone hemodiafiltration (HfPS-HDF). The 380 eligible patients were randomized to one of the two or four treatments (132 to Cu-HD, 147 to LfPS-HD, 51 to HfPS-HD and 50 to HfPS-HDF). The follow-up was 24 months. No statistical difference was observed in the algebraic sum of the end points between bicarbonate dialysis with Cuprophan or with low-flux polysulfone, or among the four dialysis methods under evaluation. There was a significant decrease in pre-dialysis plasma beta 2-microglobulin levels in high-flux dialysis of 9.04 +/- 10.46 mg/liter (23%) and in hemodiafiltration of 6.35 +/- 12.28 mg/liter (16%), both using high-flux polysulfone membrane in comparison with Cuprophan and low-flux polysulfone membranes (P = 0.032). The significant decrease in pre-dialysis plasma beta 2-microglobulin levels could have a clinical impact when one considers that beta 2-microglobulin accumulation and amyloidosis are important long-term dialysis-related complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8887291     DOI: 10.1038/ki.1996.441

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Kidney Int        ISSN: 0085-2538            Impact factor:   10.612


  29 in total

1.  Hemodialysis duration impairs food intake and nutritional parameters in chronic kidney disease patients.

Authors:  Khedidja Mekki; Mustapha Remaoun; Jacques Belleville; Malika Bouchenak
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2010-11-23       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  Amyloid, advanced glycation end products, and dialysis related arthropathy.

Authors:  S P McDonald; P T Coates; A P Disney
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 19.103

Review 3.  Home haemodialysis and uraemic toxin removal: does a happy marriage exist?

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Sunny Eloot; Nathalie Neirynck; Wim Van Biesen
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 28.314

4.  Dialysis: A step towards making online haemodiafiltration a gold standard.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Walter H Hörl
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration reduce intradialytic hypotension in ESRD.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Paolo Altieri; Simeone Andrulli; Piergiorgio Bolasco; Giovanna Sau; Luciano A Pedrini; Carlo Basile; Salvatore David; Mariano Feriani; Giovanni Montagna; Biagio Raffaele Di Iorio; Bruno Memoli; Raffaella Cravero; Giovanni Battaglia; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2010-09-02       Impact factor: 10.121

6.  Changes in urine volume and serum albumin in incident hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Rieko Eriguchi; Yoshitsugu Obi; Connie M Rhee; Jason A Chou; Amanda R Tortorici; Anna T Mathew; Taehee Kim; Melissa Soohoo; Elani Streja; Csaba P Kovesdy; Kamyar Kalantar-Zadeh
Journal:  Hemodial Int       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 1.812

Review 7.  High-flux versus low-flux membranes for end-stage kidney disease.

Authors:  Suetonia C Palmer; Kannaiyan S Rabindranath; Jonathan C Craig; Paul J Roderick; Francesco Locatelli; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-09-12

8.  Role of residual kidney function and convective volume on change in beta2-microglobulin levels in hemodiafiltration patients.

Authors:  E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Peter J Blankestijn; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Muriel P C Grooteman; Menso J Nubé; Piet M Ter Wee; Renée Lévesque; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 8.237

9.  Technical breakthroughs in the wearable artificial kidney (WAK).

Authors:  Victor Gura; Alexandra S Macy; Masoud Beizai; Carlos Ezon; Thomas A Golper
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 8.237

10.  Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Francesco Locatelli; Alejandro Martin-Malo; Thierry Hannedouche; Alfredo Loureiro; Menelaos Papadimitriou; Volker Wizemann; Stefan H Jacobson; Stanislaw Czekalski; Claudio Ronco; Raymond Vanholder
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 10.121

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.