Literature DB >> 19092122

Effect of membrane permeability on survival of hemodialysis patients.

Francesco Locatelli1, Alejandro Martin-Malo, Thierry Hannedouche, Alfredo Loureiro, Menelaos Papadimitriou, Volker Wizemann, Stefan H Jacobson, Stanislaw Czekalski, Claudio Ronco, Raymond Vanholder.   

Abstract

The effect of high-flux hemodialysis membranes on patient survival has not been unequivocally determined. In this prospective, randomized clinical trial, we enrolled 738 incident hemodialysis patients, stratified them by serum albumin < or = 4 and >4 g/dl, and assigned them to either low-flux or high-flux membranes. We followed patients for 3 to 7.5 yr. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed no significant difference between high-flux and low-flux membranes, and a Cox proportional hazards model concurred. Patients with serum albumin < or = 4 g/dl had significantly higher survival rates in the high-flux group compared with the low-flux group (P = 0.032). In addition, a secondary analysis revealed that high-flux membranes may significantly improve survival of patients with diabetes. Among those with serum albumin < or = 4 g/dl, slightly different effects among patients with and without diabetes suggested a potential interaction between diabetes status and low serum albumin in the reduction of risk conferred by high-flux membranes. In summary, we did not detect a significant survival benefit with either high-flux or low-flux membranes in the population overall, but the use of high-flux membranes conferred a significant survival benefit among patients with serum albumin < or = 4 g/dl. The apparent survival benefit among patients who have diabetes and are treated with high-flux membranes requires confirmation given the post hoc nature of our analysis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19092122      PMCID: PMC2653681          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2008060590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   10.121


  24 in total

1.  Mortality risk in hemodialysis patients and changes in nutritional indicators: DOPPS.

Authors:  Trinh B Pifer; Keith P McCullough; Friedrich K Port; David A Goodkin; Bradley J Maroni; Philip J Held; Eric W Young
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 10.612

2.  Section IV. Dialysis fluid purity.

Authors: 
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Proteomics: a novel tool to unravel the patho-physiology of uraemia.

Authors:  Eva M Weissinger; Thorsten Kaiser; Natalie Meert; Rita De Smet; Michael Walden; Harald Mischak; Raymond C Vanholder
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2004-10-19       Impact factor: 5.992

4.  Mortality risk by hemodialyzer reuse practice and dialyzer membrane characteristics: results from the usrds dialysis morbidity and mortality study.

Authors:  F K Port; R A Wolfe; T E Hulbert-Shearon; J T Daugirdas; L Y Agodoa; C Jones; S M Orzol; P J Held
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 8.860

5.  A simple comorbidity scale predicts clinical outcomes and costs in dialysis patients.

Authors:  S Beddhu; F J Bruns; M Saul; P Seddon; M L Zeidel
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Strong association between malnutrition, inflammation, and atherosclerosis in chronic renal failure.

Authors:  P Stenvinkel; O Heimbürger; F Paultre; U Diczfalusy; T Wang; L Berglund; T Jogestrand
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  The effect of membrane permeability on ESRD: design of a prospective randomised multicentre trial.

Authors:  F Locatelli; T Hannedouche; S Jacobson; G La Greca; A Loureiro; A Martin-Malo; M Papadimitriou; R Vanholder
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.902

8.  Dialyzer membrane permeability and survival in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Philippe Chauveau; Hiep Nguyen; Christian Combe; Geneviève Chêne; Raymond Azar; Noël Cano; Bernard Canaud; Denis Fouque; Maurice Laville; Xavier Leverve; Hubert Roth; Michel Aparicio
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Garabed Eknoyan; Gerald J Beck; Alfred K Cheung; John T Daugirdas; Tom Greene; John W Kusek; Michael Allon; James Bailey; James A Delmez; Thomas A Depner; Johanna T Dwyer; Andrew S Levey; Nathan W Levin; Edgar Milford; Daniel B Ornt; Michael V Rocco; Gerald Schulman; Steve J Schwab; Brendan P Teehan; Robert Toto
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Relationship of dialysis membrane and cause-specific mortality.

Authors:  W E Bloembergen; R M Hakim; D C Stannard; P J Held; R A Wolfe; L Y Agodoa; F K Port
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  101 in total

Review 1.  Normal and pathologic concentrations of uremic toxins.

Authors:  Flore Duranton; Gerald Cohen; Rita De Smet; Mariano Rodriguez; Joachim Jankowski; Raymond Vanholder; Angel Argiles
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 10.121

2.  Serum Asymmetric and Symmetric Dimethylarginine and Morbidity and Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients.

Authors:  Tariq Shafi; Thomas H Hostetter; Timothy W Meyer; Seungyoung Hwang; Xin Hai; Michal L Melamed; Tanushree Banerjee; Josef Coresh; Neil R Powe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 8.860

3.  Is peritoneal dialysis still an equal option? Results of the Berlin pediatric nocturnal dialysis program.

Authors:  Julia Thumfart; Tanja Hilliger; Christina Stiny; Steffen Wagner; Uwe Querfeld; Dominik Müller
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2015-01-27       Impact factor: 3.714

4.  Effect of online hemodiafiltration on all-cause mortality and cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Muriel P C Grooteman; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Michiel L Bots; E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Albert H A Mazairac; Claire H den Hoedt; Ingeborg van der Tweel; Renée Lévesque; Menso J Nubé; Piet M ter Wee; Peter J Blankestijn
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 10.121

5.  Dialysis: Membrane flux, dialysate purity and cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  Muriel Grooteman; Menso Nubé
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2013-06-25       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 6.  Evidence-based cardiology in hemodialysis patients.

Authors:  Michael Allon
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 10.121

7.  Dialysis: Some patients may benefit from using high-flux membranes.

Authors:  Victor F Seabra; Jacob J Clarenbach; Bertrand L Jaber
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 8.  Water quality in conventional and home haemodialysis.

Authors:  Matthew J Damasiewicz; Kevan R Polkinghorne; Peter G Kerr
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 28.314

Review 9.  Approaches to uremia.

Authors:  Timothy W Meyer; Thomas H Hostetter
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 10.121

10.  Role of residual kidney function and convective volume on change in beta2-microglobulin levels in hemodiafiltration patients.

Authors:  E Lars Penne; Neelke C van der Weerd; Peter J Blankestijn; Marinus A van den Dorpel; Muriel P C Grooteman; Menso J Nubé; Piet M Ter Wee; Renée Lévesque; Michiel L Bots
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 8.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.