Literature DB >> 888674

Effects of perilymphatic perfusion with neomycin on the cochlear microphonic potential in the guinea pig.

A L Nuttall, D M Marques, M Lawrence.   

Abstract

The effects of three concentrations of neomycin, administered by a method of acute perilymphatic perfusion of the guinea pig cochlea, on the cochlear microphonic potential (CM) at 4 kHz and 500 Hz are described. A concentration-dependent reduction in CM occured during the 60 minute perfusion period. Neomycin at 10-4 M did not change the CM magnitude, while at 10-3 and 102 M it caused 4 kHz (and 500 Hz) CM reductions which began within 24 (for both frequencies) minutes and 10 (and 12) minutes of drug application respectively. CM reduction proceeded at a higher rate for greater neomycin concentration. The perfusion technique, the implication of the frequency indifference, and the potential of the perfusion technique for inner ear biochemical analysis are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 888674     DOI: 10.3109/00016487709128863

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0001-6489            Impact factor:   1.494


  11 in total

1.  Cortical responses to cochlear implant stimulation: channel interactions.

Authors:  Julie Arenberg Bierer; John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2003-10-20

2.  Representations of Time-Varying Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Marmosets (Callithrix jacchus).

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Cochlear permeability of neomycin and gentamicin: an immunohistochemical study.

Authors:  A J Duvall; K S Robinson; S J Feist
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Effects of deafening and cochlear implantation procedures on postimplantation psychophysical electrical detection thresholds.

Authors:  Gina L Su; Deborah J Colesa; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2008-05-10       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Auditory cortex phase locking to amplitude-modulated cochlear implant pulse trains.

Authors:  John C Middlebrooks
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-03-26       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Effects of hearing preservation on psychophysical responses to cochlear implant stimulation.

Authors:  Stephen Y Kang; Deborah J Colesa; Donald L Swiderski; Gina L Su; Yehoash Raphael; Bryan E Pfingst
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2009-11-10

7.  Selective Neuronal Activation by Cochlear Implant Stimulation in Auditory Cortex of Awake Primate.

Authors:  Luke A Johnson; Charles C Della Santina; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Distribution of gentamicin by immunofluorescence in the guinea pig inner ear.

Authors:  T Hayashida; Y Nomura; M Iwamori; Y Nagai; T Kurata
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1985

9.  Laser-induced collagen remodeling and deposition within the basilar membrane of the mouse cochlea.

Authors:  Gentiana I Wenzel; Bahman Anvari; Amaan Mazhar; Brian Pikkula; John S Oghalai
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Are aminosugars ototoxic?

Authors:  M Tachibana; W Jung; K Schindler; J Schacht
Journal:  Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  1981
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.