Literature DB >> 8884672

The mental health patient profile: does it change primary care physicians' practice patterns?

P D Mazonson1, S D Mathias, S K Fifer, D P Buesching, P Malek, D L Patrick.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a prospective trial randomizing 75 physicians to either a control or intervention arm to evaluate the impact of providing patient-reported information on anxiety and other mental health symptoms and disorders to primary care physicians.
METHODS: Five hundred seventy-three patients of the study physicians who met entry criteria were randomized to either usual care or usual care supplemented with feedback of patient-reported mental health information to physicians. This mental health information was derived from initial patient-reported questionnaires completed in waiting rooms of physicians contracted to a mixed-model health maintenance organization in Colorado. Main outcome measures included impact of intervention on rates of (1) chart notation of anxiety, depression, or other mental health diagnoses or symptoms; (2) referral to mental health specialists; (3) prescription of psychotropic medications; (4) hospitalization; and (5) office visits during a 5-month observation period.
RESULTS: Physicians receiving feedback on previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety patients were more likely to make chart notations (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.51, 95 percent confidence interval [CI] = 1.62-3.87), to make referrals to mental health specialists (AOR = 3.86, 95 percent CI = 1.63-9.16), and to see patients for more frequent outpatient visits (AOR = 1.73, 95 percent CI = 1.11-2.70). Use of psychotropic medications and rate of hospitalizations did not differ significantly.
CONCLUSIONS: Providing patient-reported mental health information to primary care physicians resulted in increased recognition and referral rates for previously unrecognized and untreated anxiety patients, plus an increase in primary care visits, without concomitant increases in the use of psychotropic medications or rate of hospitalizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8884672

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract        ISSN: 0893-8652


  17 in total

1.  Implementing a Measurement Feedback System: A Tale of Two Sites.

Authors:  Leonard Bickman; Susan R Douglas; Ana Regina Vides De Andrade; Michele Tomlinson; Alissa Gleacher; Serene Olin; Kimberly Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

2.  Managing depression in primary care: community survey.

Authors:  Kerry A Collins; Vicky V Wolfe; Sandra Fisman; JoAnne DePace; Margaret Steele
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 3.  Interventions to improve management of anxiety disorders in general practice: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jantien Heideman; Eric van Rijswijk; Nieke van Lin; Sandra de Loos; Miranda Laurant; Michel Wensing; Eloy van de Lisdonk; Richard Grol
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Implementing a Measurement Feedback System in Community Mental Health Clinics: A Case Study of Multilevel Barriers and Facilitators.

Authors:  Alissa A Gleacher; Serene S Olin; Erum Nadeem; Michele Pollock; Vanesa Ringle; Leonard Bickman; Susan Douglas; Kimberly Hoagwood
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

5.  Feasibility of mental health screening and intervention in the HUNT population study.

Authors:  Ottar Bjerkeset; Alv A Dahl; Eystein Stordal; Nils Håvard Dahl; Marit Bjartveit Krüger; Olav Linaker
Journal:  Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol       Date:  2006-01-19       Impact factor: 4.328

Review 6.  Routinely administered questionnaires for depression and anxiety: systematic review.

Authors:  S M Gilbody; A O House; T A Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-02-17

7.  The applications of PROs in clinical practice: what are they, do they work, and why?

Authors:  Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-12-23       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  J M Valderas; A Kotzeva; M Espallargues; G Guyatt; C E Ferrans; M Y Halyard; D A Revicki; T Symonds; A Parada; J Alonso
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2008-01-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 9.  Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults.

Authors:  Tony Kendrick; Magdy El-Gohary; Beth Stuart; Simon Gilbody; Rachel Churchill; Laura Aiken; Abhishek Bhattacharya; Amy Gimson; Anna L Brütt; Kim de Jong; Michael Moore
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-07-13

10.  Analysis of decisions made in meta-analyses of depression screening and the risk of confirmation bias: a case study.

Authors:  Felicity A Goodyear-Smith; Mieke L van Driel; Bruce Arroll; Chris Del Mar
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 4.615

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.