Literature DB >> 8882373

Effects of soaking, cooking and fermentation on composition, in-vitro starch digestibility and nutritive value of common beans.

Z Barampama1, R E Simard.   

Abstract

A common bean variety, grown in Burundi, was either fermented, soaked and/or cooked, and then assessed for nutrient composition, in-vitro starch digestibility and protein nutritive value. A decrease in ash, most minerals, vitamins, and some essential amino acids was noted for soaked, cooked and soaked-cooked beans. Compared to untreated beans, soaking decreased soluble sugar (9.8 percent) but increased starch (7.3 percent) and soluble fiber (16.9 percent). In cooked beans, an increase in soluble sugar (1.5 percent), and a decrease in thiamine (81.7 percent), starch (24.6 percent) and soluble fiber (16.6 percent) and nitrogen (2.9 percent) contents were observed. Crude fiber (6.9 percent) and starch (10.0 percent) increased while fat (17.6 percent), fatty acids (linoleic: 10.7 percent; linolenic: 14.3 percent) and soluble sugars (25.4 percent) and nitrogen (14.4 percent) decreased in soaked-cooked beans. Fermentation increased potassium (11.6 percent), soluble fiber (18.9 percent), and some amino acids but decreased fatty acids (linoleic: 13.5 percent; linolenic: 19.9 percent), soluble sugar (75.2 percent) and vitamin (riboflavin: 41.0 percent; niacin: 24.5 percent) contents in common beans. However, the in-vitro starch digestibility was greatly improved (12.3 percent) by cooking while it decreased in soaked beans (29.2 percent). Soaking-cooking and fermentation did not have any significant effect on the digestibility of common bean starch. Finally, among the five treatments applied to common beans, only fermentation showed a significant improvement (8.3 percent) on the protein nutritive value of this legume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8882373     DOI: 10.1007/bf01088494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr        ISSN: 0921-9668            Impact factor:   3.921


  3 in total

1.  Effect of germination on the biological value of proteins and the trypsin-inhibitor activity of some common Indian pulses.

Authors:  H CHATTOPADHYAY; S BANERJEE
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  1953-04       Impact factor: 2.375

2.  The estimation of carbohydrates in plant extracts by anthrone.

Authors:  E W YEMM; A J WILLIS
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1954-07       Impact factor: 3.857

3.  Microbiological assay of protein quality with Tetrahymena pyriformis W. 4. Measurement of available lysine, methionine, arginine and histidine.

Authors:  J A Stott; H Smith
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1966       Impact factor: 3.718

  3 in total
  13 in total

1.  Nutritional composition and antinutritional factors of chickpeas (Cicer arietinum L.) undergoing different cooking methods and germination.

Authors:  Tarek A el-Adawy
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.921

2.  Macro- and microelement contents of some legume seeds.

Authors:  Mehmet Musa Özcan; Nesim Dursun; Fahad Al Juhaimi
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Chemical and nutritional changes in bitter and sweet lupin seeds (Lupinus albus L.) during bulgur production.

Authors:  Mustafa Yorgancilar; Nermin Bilgiçli
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.701

4.  Effect of soaking and cooking on dietary fibre components of different type of chickpea genotypes.

Authors:  Hina Vasishtha; Rajendra P Srivastava
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 2.701

5.  The Potential Use of Fermented Chickpea and Faba Bean Flour as Food Ingredients.

Authors:  Maria V Chandra-Hioe; Christina H M Wong; Jayashree Arcot
Journal:  Plant Foods Hum Nutr       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.921

6.  Effect of household cooking methods on nutritional and anti nutritional factors in green cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) pods.

Authors:  Jasraj K Deol; Kiran Bains
Journal:  J Food Sci Technol       Date:  2010-10-31       Impact factor: 2.701

7.  Effects of soybean meal fermented by L. plantarum, B. subtilis and S. cerevisieae on growth, immune function and intestinal morphology in weaned piglets.

Authors:  Jiajia Zhu; Mingxing Gao; Ruili Zhang; Zhuojian Sun; Chunmei Wang; Fenfang Yang; Tingting Huang; Shaoqi Qu; Li Zhao; Yuwen Li; Zhihui Hao
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2017-11-09       Impact factor: 5.328

8.  The BE GONE trial study protocol: a randomized crossover dietary intervention of dry beans targeting the gut microbiome of overweight and obese patients with a history of colorectal polyps or cancer.

Authors:  Xiaotao Zhang; Gladys Browman; Wesley Siu; Karen M Basen-Engquist; Samir M Hanash; Kristi L Hoffman; Pablo C Okhuysen; Paul Scheet; Joseph F Petrosino; Scott Kopetz; Carrie R Daniel
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.430

9.  Effects of husk and harvest time on carotenoid content and acceptability of roasted fresh cobs of orange maize hybrids.

Authors:  Oladeji E Alamu; Abebe Menkir; Bussie Maziya-Dixon; Olorunfemi Olaofe
Journal:  Food Sci Nutr       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.863

10.  Effect of Instant Controlled Pressure-Drop (DIC), Cooking and Germination on Non-Nutritional Factors of Common Vetch (Vicia sativa spp.).

Authors:  Angel I Hernandez-Aguirre; Carmen Téllez-Pérez; Alejandra San Martín-Azócar; Anaberta Cardador-Martínez
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2019-12-30       Impact factor: 4.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.