| Literature DB >> 31905949 |
Angel I Hernandez-Aguirre1, Carmen Téllez-Pérez1, Alejandra San Martín-Azócar1, Anaberta Cardador-Martínez1.
Abstract
Legumes are widely consumed by humans, being an important source of nutrients; however, they contain non-nutritional factors (NNFs), such as phytic acid (IP6), raffinose, stachyose, total phenolic compounds, condensed tannins, and flavonoids, that have negative effects on human health. Although vetches (Vicia sativa) are widely cultivated, they are not intended for human feeding due to their contents of NNF. Usually, the NNF are removed by cooking or germinating; however, germination is a process that requires extended time, and cooking may compromise the viability of some nutrients. To promote vetches for human consumption, the effect of the Instant Controlled Pressure Drop (DIC) process was studied as an alternative to cooking and germinating to decrease NNF contents. Results showed that compared to raw vetches, DIC treatment reduced total phenolic compounds (48%), condensed tannins (28%), flavonoids (65%), IP6 (92%), raffinose (77%), and stachyose (92%). These results are very similar to the ones achieved by traditional ways of removing NNF.Entities:
Keywords: cooking; germination; instant controlled pressure drop (DIC); non-nutritional factors (NNFs); oligosaccharides; phytic acid; tannins; total phenolic compounds; vetches (Vicia sativa spp.)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31905949 PMCID: PMC6982807 DOI: 10.3390/molecules25010151
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Schematic time-pressure profiles of a DIC processing cycle.
Chemical proximate analysis of non-treated vetch flour.
| Moisture (%) | 15.0 ± 0.5 |
| Ashes (%) | 2.5 ± 0.1 |
| Crude fiber (%) | 12.1 ± 0.6 |
| Total nitrogen (%) | 16.1 ± 0.9 |
| Ethereal extract (%) | 5.0 ± 0.9 |
| Nitrogen-free extract (%) 1 | 49.3 |
Values are expressed as means of three replicates ± SD. Calculated by difference.
Total phenolics content, condensed tannins content, total flavonoids content, phytic acid content, raffinose and Stachyose content of DIC, cooked, germinated and raw vetches.
| Sample | TPC 1 (mg/g) | CT 2 (mg/g) | TFC 3 (mg/m) | IP6 4 (mg/g) | Raffinose (mg/g) | Stachyose (mg/g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIC1 | 150.25 ± 0.22 | 10.16 ± 0.90 | 12.13 ± 0.22 | 10.40 ± 0.62 | 4.32 ± 0.03 | 47.20 ± 1.10 |
| DIC2 | 129.20 ± 0.45 | 9.10 ± 0.70 | 12.35 ± 0.45 | 8.48 ± 0.71 | 4.98 ± 0.08 | 38.50 ± 0.60 |
| DIC3 | 112.54 ± 0.41 | 9.41 ± 0.90 | 5.68 ± 0.04 | 11.87 ± 0.80 | 6.67 ± 0.11 | 53.82 ± 1.40 |
| DIC4 | 178.96 ± 0.46 | 11.54 ± 0.70 | 6.45 ± 0.03 | 10.04 ± 0.39 | 4.38 ± 0.07 | 45.73 ± 1.12 |
| DIC5 | 99.53 ± 0.17 | 8.83 ± 0.80 | 11.17 ± 0.24 | 0.99 ± 0.11 | 2.25 ± 0.01 | 4.41 ± 0.22 |
| DIC6 | 147.38 ± 0.22 | 9.96 ± 1.02 | 11.78 ± 0.14 | 1.02 ± 0.32 | 1.78 ± 0.00 | 4.66 ± 0.33 |
| DIC7 | 98.38 ± 0.27 | 10.16 ± 0.81 | 14.38 ± 0.17 | 10.38 ± 1.17 | 4.77 ± 0.45 | 47.69 ± 0.77 |
| DIC8 | 164.60 ± 0.22 | 11.43 ± 0.83 | 6.01 ± 0.05 | 5.09 ± 0.72 | 2.00 ± 0.04 | 23.05 ± 0.56 |
| DIC9 | 126.13 ± 0.12 | 10.64 ± 1.17 | 5.83 ± 0.03 | 5.08 ± 0.47 | 1.89 ± 0.05 | 23.11 ± 0.14 |
| DIC10 | 152.74 ± 0.10 | 10.30 ± 0.66 | 5.40 ± 0.07 | 10.41 ± 1.25 | 4.76 ± 0.03 | 47.51 ± 0.36 |
| DIC11 | 161.16 ± 0.54 | 11.05 ± 0.87 | 15.11 ± 0.77 | 6.28 ± 0.16 | 4.68 ± 0.01 | 53.15 ± 0.14 |
| DIC12 | 185.47 ± 0.45 | 12.79 ± 0.92 | 13.98 ± 0.87 | 11.53 ± 2.16 | 6.89 ± 0.44 | 28.26 ± 0.22 |
| DIC13 | 147.76 ± 0.44 | 10.18 ± 0.60 | 5.89 ± 0.11 | 10.49 ± 0.43 | 2.92 ± 0.01 | 47.57 ± 0.47 |
| C45 | 132.45 ± 0.13 | 10.67 ± 0.33 | 11.68 ± 1.01 | 1.65 ± 0.91 | 0.68 ± 0.02 | 7.54 ± 0.50 |
| C60 | 115.80 ± 0.36 | 10.12 ± 1.81 | 8.06 ± 0.23 | 0.55 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.02 | 2.57 ± 0.07 |
| C90 | 212.26 ± 0.98 | 10.02 ± 1.27 | 8.47 ± 0.11 | 0.59 ± 0.07 | 0.46 ± 0.05 | 2.64 ± 0.01 |
| C120 | 173.22 ± 0.78 | 9.80 ± 1.39 | 8.75 ± 0.19 | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 0.31 ± 0.06 | 3.07 ± 0.00 |
| Germinated | 136.66 ± 0.78 | 11.76 ± 0.70 | 11.68 ± 0.53 | 0.57 ± 0.08 | 0.31 ± 0.04 | 2.51 ± 0.17 |
1 Total Phenolics Content; 2 Condensed Tannins Content; 3 Total Flavonoids Content and 4 Phytic Acid Content Values are expressed as means of three replicates. DIC = Instant Controlled Pressure Drop treatments, C = Cooking treatments.
Effect of DIC over total phenolics, condensed tannins, and flavonoids.
| Sample | Total Phenolics Reduction (%) | Tannins Reduction (%) | Flavonoids Reduction (%) | Phytates Reduction (%) | Raffinose Reduction (%) | Stachyose Reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIC1 | 21.5 cd | 17.4 b | 26.7 abc | 23.0 c | 45.0 a | 23.0 bc |
| DIC2 | 32.5 de | 26.0 b | 25.4 abc | 37.2 e | 36.6 c | 37.2 d |
| DIC3 | 41.2 ef | 23.5 b | 65.7 c | 12.1 a | 15.1 b | 12.2 a |
| DIC4 | 5.6 ab | 6.2 ab | 61.0abc | 25.6 d | 44.3 e | 25.4 c |
| DIC5 | 48.0 ef | 28.2 b | 32.5 abc | 92.7 h | 71.4 g | 92.8 g |
| DIC6 | 23.9 cd | 19.0ab | 28.8 abc | 92.4 h | 77.4 i | 92.4 g |
| DIC7 | 48.6 f | 17.4 b | 13.1 a | 23.1 c | 39.3 d | 22.2 b |
| DIC8 | 14.0 abc | 7.1 ab | 63.7 bc | 62.3 g | 74.5 h | 62.4 f |
| DIC9 | 34.1 de | 13.5 ab | 64.8 bc | 62.4 g | 75.9 hi | 62.3 f |
| DIC10 | 20.2 abc | 16.3 ab | 67.4 bc | 22.9 c | 39.4 d | 22.5 bc |
| DIC11 | 15.8 abc | 10.2 ab | 8.7 a | 53.5 f | 40.5 d | 13.3 a |
| DIC12 | 3.1 a | −4.0a | 15.5 ab | 14.6 b | 12.3 a | 53.9 e |
| DIC13 | 22.8 cd | 17.2 ab | 64.4 bc | 22.3 c | 62.9 f | 22.4 bc |
Values are expressed as means of three replicates. Letters in the same column indicate significative differences. DIC= Instant Controlled Pressure Drop treatments, C= Cooking treatments.
Figure 2Pareto charts of significative effects on DIC treatments. (a) Total phenolics reduction, (b) Condensed tannins reduction, (c) IP6 reduction, (d) Stachyose reduction.
Figure 3Surface response plot of NNFs reduction by DIC treatment. (a) Total phenolics, (b) Condensed tannins, (c) IP6, (d) Stachyose. P = pressure; T = Time.
Effect of cooking over total phenolics, condensed tannins, and flavonoids.
| Sample | Total Phenolics Reduction (%) | Tannins Reduction (%) | Flavonoids Reduction (%) | Phytates Reduction (%) | Raffinose Reduction (%) | Stachyose Reduction (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C45 | 30.8 a | 13.2 a | 29.4 b | 87.8 b | 91.3 b | 87.7 b |
| C60 | 39.5 a | 17.7 a | 51.2 a | 95.9 a | 93.8 a | 95.8 a |
| C90 | –10.9 b | 18.5 a | 48.8 a | 95.6 a | 94.2 a | 95.7 a |
| C120 | 9.5 c | 20.3 a | 47.1 a | 95.3 a | 96.1 c | 95.0 c |
Values are expressed as means of three replicates. Letters in the same column indicate significative differences.
Effect of germination on NNF.
| NNF | Reduction (%) | Increase (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Total phenolics | - | 28.6 ± 3.1 |
| Flavonoids | - | 27.2 ± 2.8 |
| Condensed Tannins | - | 4.4 ± 0.0 |
| IP6 | 95.8 ± 0.2 | - |
| Raffinose | 96.1 ± 0.6 | - |
| Stachyose | 95.9 ± 0.0 | - |
Values are expressed as means of three replicates ± SD.
Figure 4Principal component analysis. (a) Projection of the variables on the factor-plane, (b) Projection of the cases on the factor-plane. P = Total phenolics, T = condensed tannins, F = flavonoids, R = raffinose, S = stachyose, G = germination, C = cooking, D = DIC treatments.
Vetch flour DIC processing conditions.
| Sample | Saturated Steam Pressure (MPa) | Treatment Time (s) |
|---|---|---|
| DIC1 | 0.33 | 195 |
| DIC2 | 0.45 | 195 |
| DIC3 | 0.33 | 360 |
| DIC4 | 0.33 | 195 |
| DIC5 | 0.41 | 312 |
| DIC6 | 0.41 | 78 |
| DIC7 | 0.33 | 195 |
| DIC8 | 0.24 | 78 |
| DIC9 | 0.24 | 312 |
| DIC10 | 0.33 | 195 |
| DIC11 | 0.20 | 195 |
| DIC12 | 0.33 | 30 |
| DIC13 | 0.33 | 195 |