Literature DB >> 8880571

Attitudes towards cancer predictive testing and transmission of information to the family.

C Julian-Reynier1, F Eisinger, P Vennin, F Chabal, Y Aurran, C Noguès, Y J Bignon, M Machelard-Roumagnac, C Maugard-Louboutin, D Serin, B Blanc, P Orsoni, H Sobol.   

Abstract

Before the organisation of breast cancer predictive testing in France, consultands' attitudes towards this kind of testing and towards passing on information about the family cancer risk to their relatives were investigated. This survey was carried out from January 1994 to January 1995 at six specialised cancer genetic clinics located in different parts of France Female consultands who were first degree relatives of cancer patients and who had at least one case of breast cancer in their family, affecting either themselves or a first degree relative or both, participated in this study. Among the 248 eligible consultands attending the clinics during the study period, 84.3% answered a post-consultation questionnaire. Among the 209 respondents, 40.7% (n = 85) were cancer patients and 59.3% (n = 124) were healthy consultands. A high consensus in favour of genetic testing was noted, since 87.7% of the sample stated that they would ask for breast cancer gene testing if this test became available. The underlying assumption of 96.6% of the women was that their health surveillance would be improved after a positive test. A high awareness of the anxiety that would be generated in a family after a positive result was observed and found to be associated (p < 0.05) with the anxiety and depressive profiles of the patients. Half of the healthy respondents said they would not change their attitude towards screening if the results of predictive testing turned out to be negative. Only 13.7% of the 161 patients who stated that the oncogeneticists asked them to contact their relatives firmly refused to do so, mainly because of difficult family relationships.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8880571      PMCID: PMC1050725          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.33.9.731

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  32 in total

1.  Diffusion of information about genetic risk within families.

Authors:  Ségolène Ayme; Geneviève Macquart-Moulin; Claire Julian-Reynier; Françoise Chabal; Francis Giraud
Journal:  Neuromuscul Disord       Date:  1993 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 4.296

2.  Socio-cultural inequities in access to prenatal diagnosis: the role of insurance coverage and regulatory policies.

Authors:  J P Moatti; C Le Gales; C Julian; J P Durbec; J F Mattei; S Ayme
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Uptake of presymptomatic predictive testing for Huntington's disease.

Authors:  D Craufurd; A Dodge; L Kerzin-Storrar; R Harris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1989-09-09       Impact factor: 79.321

4.  Interest in genetic testing for colon cancer susceptibility: cognitive and emotional correlates.

Authors:  R T Croyle; C Lerman
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 4.018

5.  Attitudes toward direct predictive testing for the Huntington disease gene. Relevance for other adult-onset disorders. The Canadian Collaborative Group on Predictive Testing for Huntington Disease.

Authors:  R Babul; S Adam; B Kremer; S Dufrasne; S Wiggins; M Huggins; J Theilmann; M Bloch; M R Hayden
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993-11-17       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Attitudes towards predictive testing in Huntington's disease: a recent survey in Belgium.

Authors:  G Evers-Kiebooms; J J Cassiman; H van den Berghe
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 6.318

7.  Variations in the risk of breast cancer associated with a family history of breast cancer according to age at onset and reproductive factors.

Authors:  N Andrieu; F Clavel; A Auquier; M G Lê; B Gairard; L Piana; A Brémond; J Lansac; R Flamant; R Renaud
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 8.  Genetic predisposition to breast cancer.

Authors:  M H Skolnick; L A Cannon-Albright
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-09-15       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Interest in genetic testing among first-degree relatives of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  C Lerman; J Seay; A Balshem; J Audrain
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1995-07-03

10.  Intended use of predictive testing by those at risk for Huntington disease.

Authors:  G J Meissen; R L Berchek
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1987-02
View more
  15 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of genetic counseling and testing with signal detection methods.

Authors:  Christina G S Palmer; Donald W Hadley
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Facilitating family communication about predictive genetic testing: probands' perceptions.

Authors:  Clara L Gaff; Veronica Collins; Tiffany Symes; Jane Halliday
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Assessment of psychosocial outcomes in genetic counseling research: an overview of available measurement scales.

Authors:  Nadine A Kasparian; Claire E Wakefield; Bettina Meiser
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2007-08-13       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Decision-making about inherited cancer risk: exploring dimensions of genetic responsibility.

Authors:  Holly Etchegary; Fiona Miller; Sonya deLaat; Brenda Wilson; June Carroll; Mario Cappelli
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 5.  Ethical issues of predictive genetic testing for diabetes.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

6.  Psychosocial issues following a positive result of genetic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations: findings from a focus group and a needs-assessment survey.

Authors:  L S Di Prospero; M Seminsky; J Honeyford; B Doan; E Franssen; W Meschino; P Chart; E Warner
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-04-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 7.  Notifying patients exposed to blood products associated with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease: integrating science, legal duties and ethical mandates.

Authors:  T Caulfield; J Dossetor; L Boshkov; J Hannon; D Sawyer; G Robertson
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-11-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Who Is at Risk for Psychological Distress in Genetic Testing Programs for Hereditary Cancer Disorders?

Authors:  F J Grosfeld; C J Lips; F A Beemer; H F Ten Kroode
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Women's perceptions of the personal and family impact of genetic cancer risk assessment: focus group findings.

Authors:  Deborah J MacDonald; Linda Sarna; Jeffrey N Weitzel; Betty Ferrell
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 2.537

10.  A family genetic risk communication framework: guiding tool development in genetics health services.

Authors:  Miriam E Wiens; Brenda J Wilson; Christina Honeywell; Holly Etchegary
Journal:  J Community Genet       Date:  2013-01-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.