Literature DB >> 8880391

The importance of phase I/II trials in pediatric oncology.

C A MacArthur1, T Vietti.   

Abstract

Clinical trials in pediatric oncology over the past 30 years have led to the situation today where most children with newly diagnosed cancer can be treated effectively, and many are cured. Despite this dramatic improvement in outcome for many children diagnosed with cancer, about 30-40% of children will die of their disease [1]. Although some attempts have been made to improve outcome by increasing the dose intensity of existing therapies, intolerable side effects and marginal increases in cancer cell kill limit this approach. Clearly, effective new anti-cancer agents are necessary to significantly improve the survival and quality of life in children with cancer. Well-organized pediatric Phase I trials to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and Phase II trials to establish efficacy, are critical to the identification of new anti-cancer agents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8880391     DOI: 10.1007/bf00173680

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest New Drugs        ISSN: 0167-6997            Impact factor:   3.850


  9 in total

1.  Tolerance to antineoplastic agents in children and adults.

Authors:  S Marsoni; R S Ungerleider; S B Hurson; R M Simon; L D Hammershaimb
Journal:  Cancer Treat Rep       Date:  1985-11

2.  Preclinical drug development: rationale and methods.

Authors:  J M Venditti
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 4.929

3.  p53 expression and poor prognosis in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Authors:  S Hecker; A Sauerbrey; M Volm
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.480

4.  Phase I and pharmacokinetic evaluation of all-trans-retinoic acid in pediatric patients with cancer.

Authors:  M A Smith; P C Adamson; F M Balis; J Feusner; L Aronson; R F Murphy; M E Horowitz; G Reaman; G D Hammond; R M Fenton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Phase II testing of melphalan in children with newly diagnosed rhabdomyosarcoma: a model for anticancer drug development.

Authors:  M E Horowitz; E Etcubanas; M L Christensen; J A Houghton; S L George; A A Green; P J Houghton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase II investigational window using carboplatin, iproplatin, ifosfamide, and epirubicin in children with untreated disseminated neuroblastoma: a Pediatric Oncology Group study.

Authors:  R P Castleberry; A B Cantor; A A Green; V Joshi; R L Berkow; G R Buchanan; B Leventhal; D H Mahoney; E I Smith; F A Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 7.  Pediatric phase I drug tolerance: a review and comparison of recent adult and pediatric phase I trials.

Authors:  L Carlson; P Ho; M Smith; J Reisch; S Weitman
Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.289

8.  Phase I trial of paclitaxel in children with refractory solid tumors: a Pediatric Oncology Group Study.

Authors:  C A Hurwitz; M V Relling; S D Weitman; Y Ravindranath; T J Vietti; D R Strother; A H Ragab; C B Pratt
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Different types of non-P-glycoprotein mediated multiple drug resistance in children with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukaemia.

Authors:  R Pieters; T Hongo; A H Loonen; D R Huismans; H J Broxterman; K Hählen; A J Veerman
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.