PURPOSE: Children less than 1 year of age with metastatic neuroblastoma NB are at high risk of death. The need to identify new and effective chemotherapy agents is clear. A study was conducted by the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) to determine the efficacy and safety of administering two courses of a single phase II agent before conventional treatment as a means to evaluate new agents in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-three eligible patients more than 1 year of age with disseminated neuroblastoma received two courses of one of the following: ifosfamide (IFOS) 2 g/m2/d for 4 days intravenously (IV) plus mesna; carboplatin (CARB) 560 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 hour; iproplatin (CHIP) 325 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours; or epirubicin (EPIR) 90 mg/m2 i.v. push. Following evaluation for response and toxicity, eligible patients were randomized to receive either cisplatin 90 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide 200 mg/m2 i.v. on day 3, cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2/d orally on days 7 to 13, doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 i.v. on day 14 (CECA), or cisplatin 40 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 5 and etoposide 200 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 to 4 alternating at 3-week intervals with cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2/d orally on days 1 to 7 and doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 IV on day 8 (HDP/VP/CA). An additional 86 patients were randomized to receive either CECA or HDP/VP/CA without initial phase II therapy. RESULTS: After phase II therapy, only 20% of patients experienced grade 3/4 hematopoietic toxicity. No toxic deaths occurred. Objective response rates (partial responses [PRs] plus minor responses [MRs]) following IFOS, CARB, CHIP, and EPIR were 70%, 77%, 67%, and 26%, respectively. Following phase III treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in rates of complete response (CR)/PR or progressive disease (PD), or in time to PD of patients who participated in the phase II window versus those who received only CECA or HDP/VP/CA. CONCLUSION: IFOS, CARB, and CHIP are efficacious in neuroblastoma, are well tolerated, and should be incorporated into primary treatment regimens. Combination regimens using these agents may be possible, since most repeat courses were given within 2 weeks. Administering phase II therapy to untreated patients with high-risk tumors provides a unique and sensitive method to assess new agents without compromising patient outcome.
RCT Entities:
PURPOSE:Children less than 1 year of age with metastatic neuroblastoma NB are at high risk of death. The need to identify new and effective chemotherapy agents is clear. A study was conducted by the Pediatric Oncology Group (POG) to determine the efficacy and safety of administering two courses of a single phase II agent before conventional treatment as a means to evaluate new agents in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-three eligible patients more than 1 year of age with disseminated neuroblastoma received two courses of one of the following: ifosfamide (IFOS) 2 g/m2/d for 4 days intravenously (IV) plus mesna; carboplatin (CARB) 560 mg/m2 i.v. over 1 hour; iproplatin (CHIP) 325 mg/m2 IV over 2 hours; or epirubicin (EPIR) 90 mg/m2 i.v. push. Following evaluation for response and toxicity, eligible patients were randomized to receive either cisplatin 90 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, etoposide 200 mg/m2 i.v. on day 3, cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2/d orally on days 7 to 13, doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 i.v. on day 14 (CECA), or cisplatin 40 mg/m2 IV on days 1 to 5 and etoposide 200 mg/m2 i.v. on days 2 to 4 alternating at 3-week intervals with cyclophosphamide 150 mg/m2/d orally on days 1 to 7 and doxorubicin 35 mg/m2 IV on day 8 (HDP/VP/CA). An additional 86 patients were randomized to receive either CECA or HDP/VP/CA without initial phase II therapy. RESULTS: After phase II therapy, only 20% of patients experienced grade 3/4 hematopoietic toxicity. No toxic deaths occurred. Objective response rates (partial responses [PRs] plus minor responses [MRs]) following IFOS, CARB, CHIP, and EPIR were 70%, 77%, 67%, and 26%, respectively. Following phase III treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in rates of complete response (CR)/PR or progressive disease (PD), or in time to PD of patients who participated in the phase II window versus those who received only CECA or HDP/VP/CA. CONCLUSION:IFOS, CARB, and CHIP are efficacious in neuroblastoma, are well tolerated, and should be incorporated into primary treatment regimens. Combination regimens using these agents may be possible, since most repeat courses were given within 2 weeks. Administering phase II therapy to untreated patients with high-risk tumors provides a unique and sensitive method to assess new agents without compromising patient outcome.
Authors: Julie R Park; Jeffrey R Scott; Clinton F Stewart; Wendy B London; Arlene Naranjo; Victor M Santana; Peter J Shaw; Susan L Cohn; Katherine K Matthay Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-10-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Meaghan Granger; Stephan A Grupp; Morris Kletzel; Cynthia Kretschmar; Arlene Naranjo; Wendy B London; Lisa Diller Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2012-06-28 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Wendy Landier; Kristin Knight; F Lennie Wong; Jin Lee; Ola Thomas; Heeyoung Kim; Susan G Kreissman; Mary Lou Schmidt; Lu Chen; Wendy B London; James G Gurney; Smita Bhatia Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Wayne L Furman; Lisa M McGregor; M Beth McCarville; Mihaela Onciu; Andrew M Davidoff; Sandy Kovach; Dana Hawkins; Valerie McPherson; Peter J Houghton; Catherine A Billups; Jianrong Wu; Clinton F Stewart; Victor M Santana Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 3.850