Literature DB >> 8689336

Pediatric phase I drug tolerance: a review and comparison of recent adult and pediatric phase I trials.

L Carlson1, P Ho, M Smith, J Reisch, S Weitman.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated the ratio of pediatric to adult maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) from 70 Phase I studies conducted between 1975 and 1995. The aim of this study was to determine whether previously observed differences in drug tolerance between adult and pediatric Phase I patients have persisted over the 20-year period of this analysis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Phase I trials of pediatric and adult patients with solid tumors as the predominant diagnosis and sharing similar dosing regimens were evaluated. For consistent comparison between Phase I studies, the MTD was defined as the drug dose one level below that yielding dose-limiting toxicity in >30% of patients. The ratio of pediatric to adult MTDs was calculated and plotted chronologically by year of pediatric study closure. Statistical evaluation of MTD ratios included regression and correlation analysis. The extent of therapy before Phase I study entry was also examined.
RESULTS: Ninety-three Phase I studies were reviewed. Twenty-one drugs (70 studies) met our criteria for paired review of MTDs and analysis of the variation of ratio with time. The pediatric to adult MTD ratios ranged from 0.4 to 2.8, with a median of 1.2. Regression analysis of the ratio of MTD versus date of pediatric study closure supports a linear relationship of decreasing ratio with time (p<0.01). Analysis of the regression line predicts MTD ratios of 2.02 and 0.76 for 1974 and 1995, respectively. Of patients included in this analysis, 37.1% and 68.6% of adult and pediatric patients, respectively, were considered to have been heavily pretreated before study entry. A significant (p<0.001) downward trend with time was observed in the proportion of adult patients entering Phase I studies who had received both radiation and chemotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this review continue to show an equal or greater drug tolerance in the pediatric population when compared with adult patients for most drugs studied during Phase I trials. However, there appears to be significant trend of decreasing differences in drug tolerance between pediatric and adult Phase I patients with time, as defined by the descent of the MTD ratio toward values <1.0. Mechanisms to explain greater drug tolerance in children and the observation of decreasing maximum tolerated dose ratios with time are discussed. Limited data suggest that changes in degree of therapy before Phase I study entry may be influencing the MTD ratio.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8689336     DOI: 10.1097/00043426-199608000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Hematol Oncol        ISSN: 1077-4114            Impact factor:   1.289


  5 in total

Review 1.  The importance of phase I/II trials in pediatric oncology.

Authors:  C A MacArthur; T Vietti
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Characteristics and outcome of pediatric patients enrolled in phase I oncology trials.

Authors:  Aerang Kim; Elizabeth Fox; Katherine Warren; Susan M Blaney; Stacey L Berg; Peter C Adamson; Madeleine Libucha; Elena Byrley; Frank M Balis; Brigitte C Widemann
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2008-06

3.  A phase I study of nolatrexed dihydrochloride in children with advanced cancer. A United Kingdom Children's Cancer Study Group Investigation.

Authors:  E J Estlin; C R Pinkerton; I J Lewis; L Lashford; H McDowell; B Morland; J Kohler; D R Newell; A V Boddy; G A Taylor; L Price; S Ablett; R Hobson; M Pitsiladis; M Brampton; N Clendeninn; A Johnston; A D Pearson
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-01-05       Impact factor: 7.640

4.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of pediatric oncology patients with aggressive biology enrolled in phase I clinical trials designed for adults: the university of Texas MD anderson cancer center experience.

Authors:  Eugenie S Kleinerman; Razelle Kurzrock; Vivek Subbiah; Fernando F Corrales-Medina; Cynthia Herzog; Kenneth Hess; Daniela Egas-Bejar; David S Hong; Gerald Falchook; Pete Anderson; Cesar Nunez; Winston W Huh; Aung Naing; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Jennifer Wheler; Sarina Piha Paul; Filip Janku
Journal:  Oncoscience       Date:  2014-07-27

Review 5.  Navigating the Regulatory Landscape to Develop Pediatric Oncology Drugs: Expert Opinion Recommendations.

Authors:  Elly Barry; Darrin Beaupre; Eileen Blasi; Jaimie A Walsh; Scott L Weinrich; Daniel R Arenson; Ira A Jacobs
Journal:  Paediatr Drugs       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.022

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.