Literature DB >> 8877053

Risk-adjusted cancer-incidence rates (United States).

R M Merrill1, E J Feuer.   

Abstract

A risk-adjusted method is proposed for estimating cancer incidence rates from data collected by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program of the US National Cancer Institute. Unlike the conventional incidence-rate estimates reported by SEER, this method considers only the first primary cancer, and adjusts for population-based cancer prevalence, as well as for surgical procedures which remove an individual from risk of developing a given cancer. Thus, risk-adjusted incidence-rates more accurately reflect the average cancer risk for individuals in the cancer-free, at-risk population. The results of the analysis indicate that, in general, incidence-rate estimates are fairly similar between the conventional and risk-adjusted methods. However, this is not the case for certain cancer sites which may have: (i) a high number of subsequent primary cancers (e.g., melanomas-skin); (ii) a high cancer prevalence proportion (e.g., prostate cancer); (iii) a high number of subsequent primary cancers and prevalence proportion (e.g., female breast); or (iv) a high prevalence of removal of the organ in question (e.g., cervical and uterine cancers). For example, by applying the risk-adjusted incidence method for in situ and invasive cervical cancer, we found that in the period 1990-92 the age-adjusted incidence-rate estimate increased from 57.8 to 66.3 (15 percent) per 100,000 person-years; the greatest increase in the incidence-rate estimate occurred for women aged 65 to 69 years, from 40.1 to 63.2 (58 percent) per 100,000 person-years; and the lifetime risk of developing cervical cancer increased from 4.6 (1 in 22) to 5.5 (1 in 18) percent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8877053     DOI: 10.1007/bf00051888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  22 in total

1.  The probability of developing cancer.

Authors:  R E CASHMAN; P R GERHARDT; I D GOLDBERG; V H HANDY; M L LEVIN
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1956-08       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Breast cancer incidence and prevalence estimated from survival and mortality.

Authors:  R Capocaccia; A Verdecchia; A Micheli; M Sant; G Gatta; F Berrino
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Central registry of cancer cases in Connecticut.

Authors:  R R Connelly; P C Campbell; H Eisenberg
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  The rising frequency of hysterectomy: its effect on uterine cancer rates.

Authors:  J L Lyon; J W Gardner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1977-05       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  The lifetime risk of developing breast cancer.

Authors:  E J Feuer; L M Wun; C C Boring; W D Flanders; M J Timmel; T Tong
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1993-06-02       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project's Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

Authors:  K Giles; P J Flynn; R Dalton; R Zera
Journal:  Minn Med       Date:  1993-12

7.  Graphs to estimate an individualized risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Benichou; M H Gail; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Hysterectomy in the United States, 1988-1990.

Authors:  L S Wilcox; L M Koonin; R Pokras; L T Strauss; Z Xia; H B Peterson
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Cancer statistics, 1995.

Authors:  P A Wingo; T Tong; S Bolden
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1995 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 508.702

10.  Second primary cancers in patients with cutaneous malignant melanoma: a population-based study in Sweden.

Authors:  C Wassberg; M Thörn; J Yuen; U Ringborg; T Hakulinen
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Understanding population-based site-specific cancer incidence rates in the USA.

Authors:  Ray M Merrill; Arielle Sloan; Lelinneth B Novilla
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  MYH9 genetic variants associated with glomerular disease: what is the role for genetic testing?

Authors:  Jeffrey B Kopp; Cheryl A Winkler; George W Nelson
Journal:  Semin Nephrol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 5.299

3.  Breast cancer incidence in a cohort of U.S. flight attendants.

Authors:  Mary K Schubauer-Berigan; Jeri L Anderson; Misty J Hein; Mark P Little; Alice J Sigurdson; Lynne E Pinkerton
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  State-level uterine corpus cancer incidence rates corrected for hysterectomy prevalence, 2004 to 2008.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Susan S Devesa; Vilma Cokkinides; Jiemin Ma; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Estimating lifetime and age-conditional probabilities of developing cancer.

Authors:  L M Wun; R M Merrill; E J Feuer
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Comparison of two methods based on cross-sectional data for correcting corpus uterine cancer incidence and probabilities.

Authors:  R M Merrill; J L Lyon; C Wiggins
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2001-09-06       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Ovarian Cancer Incidence Corrected for Oophorectomy.

Authors:  Lauren A Baldwin; Quan Chen; Thomas C Tucker; Connie G White; Robert N Ore; Bin Huang
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-01

8.  Estimating age conditional probability of developing disease from surveillance data.

Authors:  Michael P Fay
Journal:  Popul Health Metr       Date:  2004-07-27

9.  Effect of hysterectomy on incidence trends of endometrial and cervical cancer in Finland 1953-2010.

Authors:  R Luoto; J Raitanen; E Pukkala; A Anttila
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-05-04       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.