Literature DB >> 21874603

Understanding population-based site-specific cancer incidence rates in the USA.

Ray M Merrill1, Arielle Sloan, Lelinneth B Novilla.   

Abstract

As compared with conventionally reported national population-based incidence rates, incidence rates better represent the "burden" of disease if they remove prevalent cases from the denominator. In order to reflect the "risk" in a disease-free population, rates should both exclude prevalent cases from the denominator and second or later diagnosed cases at the same site from the numerator. Five common cancers were evaluated through a correction method using 2005-2007 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program data to determine the extent of difference between conventional and corrected incidence rates. These corrections lowered the incidence rates 4.0-5.8% for female breast cancer, 4.6-7.6% for melanoma, 3.0-4.0% for colorectal cancer, and 2.1-2.5% for lung and bronchus cancer. Corrected incidence rates for prostate cancer were 9.9-13.7% higher. In cancers with either high prevalence and/or high occurrence of multiple primaries at the same site, corrected population-based incidence rates are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21874603     DOI: 10.1007/s13187-011-0266-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Educ        ISSN: 0885-8195            Impact factor:   2.037


  6 in total

Review 1.  The surveillance, epidemiology, and end results program: a national resource.

Authors:  B F Hankey; L A Ries; B K Edwards
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Risk-adjusted cancer-incidence rates (United States).

Authors:  R M Merrill; E J Feuer
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 2.506

3.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

Review 4.  Cancer survival and incidence from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program.

Authors:  Lynn A Gloeckler Ries; Marsha E Reichman; Denise Riedel Lewis; Benjamin F Hankey; Brenda K Edwards
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2003

Review 5.  Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness.

Authors:  Freddie Bray; D Max Parkin
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2008-12-29       Impact factor: 9.162

6.  Multiple primary tumours in women following breast cancer, 1973-2000.

Authors:  J S Raymond; C J R Hogue
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2006-06-05       Impact factor: 7.640

  6 in total
  2 in total

1.  Cancer incidence among capacitor manufacturing workers exposed to polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  Avima M Ruder; Misty J Hein; Nancy B Hopf; Martha A Waters
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.214

2.  Mortality and cancer incidence in a pooled cohort of US firefighters from San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia (1950-2009).

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Travis L Kubale; James H Yiin; Matthew M Dahm; Thomas R Hales; Dalsu Baris; Shelia H Zahm; James J Beaumont; Kathleen M Waters; Lynne E Pinkerton
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 4.402

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.