Literature DB >> 8873035

Modeling dose distributions from portal dose images using the convolution/superposition method.

T R McNutt, T R Mackie, P Reckwerdt, B R Paliwal.   

Abstract

Post-treatment dose verification refers to the process of reconstructing delivered dose distributions internal to a patient from information obtained during the treatment. The exit dose is commonly used to describe the dose beyond the exit surface of the patient from a megavoltage photon beam. Portal imaging provides a method of determining the dose in a plane distal to a patient from a megavoltage therapeutic beam. This exit dose enables reconstruction of the dose distribution from external beam radiation throughout the patient utilizing the convolution/superposition method and an extended phantom. An iterative convolution/superposition algorithm has been created to reconstruct dose distributions in patients from exit dose measurements during a radiotherapy treatment. The method is based on an extended phantom that includes the patient CT representation and an electronic portal imaging device (EPID). The convolution/superposition method computes the dose throughout the extended phantom, which allows the portal dose image to be predicted in the EPID. The process is then reversed to take the portal dose measurement and infer what the dose distribution must have been to produce the measured portal dose. The dose distribution is modeled without knowledge of the incident intensity distribution, and includes the effects of scatter in the computation. The iterative method begins by assuming that the primary energy fluence (PEF) at the portal image plane is equal to the portal dose image, the PEF is then back-projected through the extended phantom and convolved with the dose deposition kernel to determine a new prediction of the portal dose image. The image of the ratio of the computed PEF to the computed portal dose is then multiplied by the measured portal dose image to produce a better representation of the PEF. Successive iterations of this process then converge to the exiting PEF image that would produce the measured portal dose image. Once convergence is established, the dose distribution is determined by back-projecting the PEF and convolving with the dose deposition kernel. The method is accurate, provided the patient representation during treatment is known. The method was used on three phantoms with a photon energy of 6 MV to verify convergence and accuracy of the algorithm. The reconstructed dose volumes agree to within 3% of the forward computation dose volumes. Furthermore, this technique assumes no prior knowledge of the incident fluence and therefore may better represent the dose actually delivered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8873035     DOI: 10.1118/1.597872

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  8 in total

1.  Monte Carlo-based adaptive EPID dose kernel accounting for different field size responses of imagers.

Authors:  Song Wang; Joseph K Gardner; John J Gordon; Weidong Li; Luke Clews; Peter B Greer; Jeffrey V Siebers
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Development of multi-planar dose verification by use of a flat panel EPID for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Yuji Nakaguchi; Fujio Araki; Tomohiro Kouno; Takeshi Ono; Kazunari Hioki
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2012-12-11

3.  Dosimetric evaluation of heterogeneity corrections for RTOG 0236: stereotactic body radiotherapy of inoperable stage I-II non-small-cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Lech Papiez; Rebecca Paulus; Robert Timmerman; William L Straube; Walter R Bosch; Jeff Michalski; James M Galvin
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2009-03-15       Impact factor: 7.038

4.  Guide to clinical use of electronic portal imaging.

Authors:  M G Herman; J J Kruse; C R Hagness
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Feasibility of using two-dimensional array dosimeter for in vivo dose reconstruction via transit dosimetry.

Authors:  Heeteak Chung; Jonathan Li; Sanjiv Samant
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2011-04-08       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Stability of the Helical TomoTherapy Hi·Art II detector for treatment beam irradiations.

Authors:  Karin Schombourg; François Bochud; Raphaël Moeckli
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2014-11-08       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Comparison of measured and computed portal dose for IMRT treatment.

Authors:  Savino Cilla; Pietro Viola; Luigi Azario; Luca Grimaldi; Maurizio Craus; Guido D'Onofrio; Andrea Fidanzio; Alessio Giuseppe Morganti; Angelo Piermattei
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2006-08-24       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  On flattening filter-free portal dosimetry.

Authors:  Eduardo Pardo; Juan Castro Novais; María Yolanda Molina López; Sheila Ruiz Maqueda
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.