BACKGROUND: Excimer laser trephination, as an alternative to mechanical trephination of the cornea in penetrating keratoplasty, is expected to reduce long-term postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Trephination with high energy densities may induce thermal epithelial alterations when metal aperture masks are used. METHODS: Ninety porcine eyes fixed in an artificial anterior chamber (20 mmHg) were trephined with a 193-nm excimer laser in order to study the effect of the temperature on the cornea and the aperture mask during and after termination of the laser exposure. Energy levels tested were in the range used in patients. A pyroelectric infrared sensor connected to a PC via an analog-digital converter was used. With a high-speed sampling routine written in C+2 it was possible to monitor on line the temperature in a focus 0.8 mm in diameter. RESULTS: In donor trephination the maximum temperature increase of the metal mask was 11 K (donor tissue 6.1 K, repetition rate 30/s). During recipient trephination the maximum temperature increase of the mask was 9.4 K (7.5 K on the cornea). An increase in the repetition rate and a decrease in the rotation speed resulted in greater temperature increase of the exposed cornea or metal mask. CONCLUSIONS: Online monitoring of cornea and mask surface temperatures during excimer laser trephination is possible using high-speed sampling equipment. Appropriate adjustment of repetition rate and rotation speed may reduce thermal effects, especially in donor trephination.
BACKGROUND: Excimer laser trephination, as an alternative to mechanical trephination of the cornea in penetrating keratoplasty, is expected to reduce long-term postkeratoplasty astigmatism. Trephination with high energy densities may induce thermal epithelial alterations when metal aperture masks are used. METHODS: Ninety porcine eyes fixed in an artificial anterior chamber (20 mmHg) were trephined with a 193-nm excimer laser in order to study the effect of the temperature on the cornea and the aperture mask during and after termination of the laser exposure. Energy levels tested were in the range used in patients. A pyroelectric infrared sensor connected to a PC via an analog-digital converter was used. With a high-speed sampling routine written in C+2 it was possible to monitor on line the temperature in a focus 0.8 mm in diameter. RESULTS: In donor trephination the maximum temperature increase of the metal mask was 11 K (donor tissue 6.1 K, repetition rate 30/s). During recipient trephination the maximum temperature increase of the mask was 9.4 K (7.5 K on the cornea). An increase in the repetition rate and a decrease in the rotation speed resulted in greater temperature increase of the exposed cornea or metal mask. CONCLUSIONS: Online monitoring of cornea and mask surface temperatures during excimer laser trephination is possible using high-speed sampling equipment. Appropriate adjustment of repetition rate and rotation speed may reduce thermal effects, especially in donor trephination.