Literature DB >> 7982817

Effect of interaural time differences on middle-latency and late auditory evoked magnetic fields.

L McEvoy1, J P Mäkelä, M Hämäläinen, R Hari.   

Abstract

To determine if interaural time differences (ITDs) in binaural stimuli affect the middle-latency auditory evoked fields (AEFs) in the same manner as they affect the N100m deflection, neuromagnetic responses were recorded over the whole head using a 122-channel SQUID magnetometer. Binaural stimuli were lateralized to three positions, left, midline, and right, on the basis of ITDs. The N100m was significantly larger to stimuli with contralaterally-leading ITDs than to stimuli with no, or with ipsilaterally-leading ITDs. Neither the P30m nor the P50m deflections of the middle-latency response were significantly affected by ITD, although the P30m showed a tendency, similar to but smaller than that of N100m, to be larger to stimuli with contralaterally-leading ITDs. In some subjects, the source location of the P50m was anterior and inferior to the sources of the P30m and N100m, which are generated in the superior surface of the temporal lobe. Sound-related muscular artifacts were seen in the posterior recording channels of one subject, and the contribution of this activity to the signals over the temporal area was determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7982817     DOI: 10.1016/0378-5955(94)90031-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hear Res        ISSN: 0378-5955            Impact factor:   3.208


  9 in total

1.  Language and music: differential hemispheric dominance in detecting unexpected errors in the lyrics and melody of memorized songs.

Authors:  Takuya Yasui; Kimitaka Kaga; Kuniyoshi L Sakai
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Lateralized auditory spatial perception and the contralaterality of cortical processing as studied with functional magnetic resonance imaging and magnetoencephalography.

Authors:  M G Woldorff; C Tempelmann; J Fell; C Tegeler; B Gaschler-Markefski; H Hinrichs; H J Heinz; H Scheich
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Auditory evoked fields to illusory sound source movements.

Authors:  J P Mäkelä; L McEvoy
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Electrophysiological responses to lateral shifts are not consistent with opponent-channel processing of interaural level differences.

Authors:  Erol J Ozmeral; David A Eddins; Ann Clock Eddins
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Lateralization and Binaural Interaction of Middle-Latency and Late-Brainstem Components of the Auditory Evoked Response.

Authors:  Andrew R Dykstra; Daniel Burchard; Christian Starzynski; Helmut Riedel; Andre Rupp; Alexander Gutschalk
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-19

6.  Children show hemispheric differences in the basic auditory response properties.

Authors:  Tiina Parviainen; Päivi Helenius; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 5.038

7.  Evidence for opponent-channel coding of interaural time differences in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  David A Magezi; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Modulations of neural activity in auditory streaming caused by spectral and temporal alternation in subsequent stimuli: a magnetoencephalographic study.

Authors:  Ivan Chakalov; Rossitza Draganova; Andreas Wollbrink; Hubert Preissl; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 3.288

9.  Are interaural time and level differences represented by independent or integrated codes in the human auditory cortex?

Authors:  Barrie A Edmonds; Katrin Krumbholz
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-11-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.