Literature DB >> 8869984

The role of context in reading with central field loss.

E M Fine1, E Peli.   

Abstract

It has been suggested that readers with central field loss (CFL) may not be able to use context to facilitate reading in the same way that normally sighted readers do because their processing capacity is fully utilized decoding the degraded visual stimulus. If true, this could account for their slow reading, even when text is appropriately magnified. Readers with CFL and normally sighted, age-matched controls read sentences and lists of random words from two dynamic text displays. We used sentence-gain (the ratio of reading rates for sentences to random words) to assess the use of context. Sentence-gain was equivalent across groups. Therefore, reduced reliance on context cannot explain the slower reading rates of people with CFL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8869984     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199608000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  12 in total

1.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Sensory and cognitive influences on the training-related improvement of reading speed in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Yingchen He; Gordon E Legge; Deyue Yu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2013-06-24       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Extending the MNREAD sentence corpus: Computer-generated sentences for measuring visual performance in reading.

Authors:  J S Mansfield; N Atilgan; A M Lewis; G E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2019-02-18       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  [Localization of scotomas in AMD by reading test : Random series of words in standardized format].

Authors:  W Eisenbarth; U Pado; S Schriever; D Schötschel; N Feucht; M MacKeben
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Reading speed does not benefit from increased line spacing in AMD patients.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Samuel H Jarvis; Stanley Y Woo; Kara Hanson; Randall T Jose
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Random word recognition chart helps scotoma assessment in low vision.

Authors:  Manfred MacKeben; Unni K W Nair; Laura L Walker; Donald C Fletcher
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Perceptual and Cognitive Factors Imposing "Speed Limits" on Reading Rate: A Study with the Rapid Serial Visual Presentation.

Authors:  Silvia Primativo; Donatella Spinelli; Pierluigi Zoccolotti; Maria De Luca; Marialuisa Martelli
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-18       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Effects of Word Width and Word Length on Optimal Character Size for Reading of Horizontally Scrolling Japanese Words.

Authors:  Wataru Teramoto; Takuyuki Nakazaki; Kaoru Sekiyama; Shuji Mori
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-02-16

9.  Evaluation of a gaze-controlled vision enhancement system for reading in visually impaired people.

Authors:  Carlos Aguilar; Eric Castet
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Accurate reading with sequential presentation of single letters.

Authors:  Nicholas S C Price; Gemma L Edwards
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-30       Impact factor: 4.677

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.